Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Maybe there are other solutions, but there's a limit to how much I'm > willing to think about this particular requirement in my spare time. Ok guys, don't worry about it. I was sort of hoping someone had a semi easy way. Not worth the pai

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:47 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote: > > Get different (and clueful) auditors? > > -- > C. Michael Pilato > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development I think it is more the client. I've pointed out their options, so I'm trying to automate a pain

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 6:31 AM, "Bert Huijben" wrote: > > To get you the 'svn blame' / 'svn annotate' output your Subversion client > reads all the full versions of the file that existed since the file was > created. The current format is just one of the possible output formats that > we can calcu

Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-22 Thread Charles Gallo
Hey Gang, Ok, IMHO, they are good enough, but not for my current client. They basically want to append the Equivalent of blame or annotate to the actual source code lines! So say in c# you'd see A++ //CAG 2013-04-13 Yep, they also don't want you deleting code, you comment it out... Their lo