u> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 8:08 PM, BD wrote:
>
>>
>> So the question remains, taking physical restraints out of the question,
>> is there anyone out there who knows about managing the risks assocciated
>> with having two or more apache/svn nodes acc
managing the risks assocciated with
having two or more apache/svn nodes accessing repos that are stored on a
shared NFS storage system, with the SVN DBs using FSFS.
B
On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/7/2010 10:26 AM, BD wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I&
Fri, May 7, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt <
subversion-20...@ryandesign.com> wrote:
>
> On May 7, 2010, at 10:26, BD wrote:
>
> > I'm starting a new project to consolidate all svn repos across our
> company into a single instance. Originally we looked at doing a
> active
Hi All,
I'm starting a new project to consolidate all svn repos across our company
into a single instance. Originally we looked at doing a active-passive
cluster, but after looking at the loads on the current individual svn repos,
we are thinking that an active-active cluster would be preferable.
