e that we could also do this (in
rather rare cases when we merge upstream) if we have mergeinfo filled
for our release branches.
Thank you for sharing your experience,
Andrey Paramonov
d how
the mergeinfo about upstream merges could be really useful.
Thank you for your valuable comments,
Andrey Paramonov
On 20.10.2011 17:55, Bob Archer wrote:
On 19.10.2011 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22:05PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
What about my other fears, bloated svn:mergeinfo
The entire svn:mergeinfo property is stored in RAM and parsed from
string form into a data
On 19.10.2011 14:00, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:22:05PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
What about my other fears, bloated svn:mergeinfo
The entire svn:mergeinfo property is stored in RAM and parsed from
string form into a data structure (nested hash table) before it is
On 19.10.2011 11:44, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
On 18.10.2011 20:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:40:37 +0400:
What confuses people most now is the scattered
svn:mergeinfo ("Oh, why that di
On 18.10.2011 20:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:40:37 +0400:
What confuses people most now is the scattered
svn:mergeinfo ("Oh, why that dir has modified status, my merge
shouldn't have changed it!").
Isn't this particular issu
(slowness) and conflicting (major annoyance).
Maybe I'm missing something?
Your comments greatly appreciated,
Andrey Paramonov
On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences when
transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF sequences
at the ends of the lines in my working copy
On 13.10.2011 15:54, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51:46 +0400:
On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
No, it's a feature, showing
On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote:
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the
locally-modified version. You can do
% svn blame file@BASE
for the old beha
I get "- -" for all lines, not just locally
modified ones.
svn blame file@BASE works, thanks.
My server is of version 1.6, if it matters.
Best wishes,
Andrey Paramonov
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 13:14:35 +0400:
Hello!
To reproduce:
0) Checkout a working cop
available.
This is a regression compared to 1.6.12.
Best wishes,
Andrey Paramonov
12 matches
Mail list logo
