Re: svn up "dry-run"

2011-05-26 Thread Alex Bligh
). Fantastic - thanks. -- Alex Bligh

svn up "dry-run"

2011-05-26 Thread Alex Bligh
output to svn up, but not actually doing anything. I could then parse the output of that. However, that command doesn't' actually exist. I suppose I could parse the output of "svn diff -r HEAD" but that seems pretty expensive given it's diffing millions of files and I onl

RE: svn log behaviour

2011-02-14 Thread Alex Bligh
; does that latter, and thus was showing all the differences up. I have to say the red book doesn't explain that distinction particularly clearly. But now I know. -- Alex Bligh

Re: svn log behaviour

2011-02-14 Thread Alex Bligh
--On 14 February 2011 07:57:50 + Alex Bligh wrote: If I do "svn log ." in a directory, it does not list all changes made to all files in that directory (as shown up "svn log "). I've pasted an example at: http://pastebin.com/SFYDtkBk where r12062 does not sh

Re: svn log behaviour

2011-02-13 Thread Alex Bligh
he revision of the directory (shown with "svn info"). Yes, the directory is up to date. In fact all changes were made in that directory (not on another machine). -- Alex Bligh

svn log behaviour

2011-02-13 Thread Alex Bligh
n diff . does the expected, and the file is not in svn:ignore. Is this deliberate and how do I get a recursive list of logs? -- Alex Bligh