Re: svn binary packages for macOS

2021-10-16 Thread Mark Phippard
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 8:57 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > I second Mark's suggestion that we should only list those providing recent > versions. Would this be a reasonable definition: "Any software listed should > provide the latest bugfix of any supported version", where "version" is 1.10, > 1

Re: svn binary packages for macOS

2021-10-16 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den mån 4 okt. 2021 kl 18:26 skrev Mark Phippard : > On Oct 4, 2021, at 12:00 PM, Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:44 AM Mark Phippard > wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Daniel Sahlberg > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> If "only providing outdated versions" is

Re: svn binary packages for macOS

2021-10-16 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den mån 4 okt. 2021 kl 17:44 skrev Mark Phippard : > Historically, we only allowed distributions of our command line > binaries to be listed. TortoiseSVN was the first exception we made and > that was after they added the command line binaries as part of their > installer. But AFAIK, clients like

Re: svn binary packages for macOS

2021-10-16 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den ons 6 okt. 2021 kl 00:46 skrev Ryan Schmidt < subversion-2...@ryandesign.com>: > On Oct 4, 2021, at 10:23, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > > WANdisco is providing Subversion 1.10.6 for Mac OS 10.9. Is that version > of Mac OS supported by Fink/Homebrew/MacPorts? > > I am a manager of MacPorts. MacP