On 28.06.2020 13:35, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:04:18AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Branko ??ibej wrote on Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:20 +0200:
>> What are the differences between f1 and f3? Would «echo 3 > format»
>> (plus perhaps some manual edits) allow current svnadmin's to
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 11:04:18AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Branko ??ibej wrote on Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:20 +0200:
> What are the differences between f1 and f3? Would «echo 3 > format»
> (plus perhaps some manual edits) allow current svnadmin's to dump the
> repository?
Nope, after echo 3 >
Hi Nico
Thanks for your suggestion, which gave me an idea: I can copy the repo
on a USB drive, boot an old live system of some kind, and checkout the
repo onto my USB drive. It's just a matter of which version I need to
support the version 1 repository format.
Cheers, Ben
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 11:20:37PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> What version of subversion on what operating system was your
> original server? And what are you tyring to upgrade to?
I have been using SVN since version 1.0. On the server where the repo
lives, SVN is now 1.13 (it has just bee
Branko Čibej wrote on Sun, 28 Jun 2020 11:20 +0200:
> On 27.06.2020 15:04, Ben Elliston wrote:
> > I was a very early SVN user. I have a repo last timestamped January
> > 2003 that I want to get files and data out of. When I run svn upgrade,
> > I get:
> >
> > svnadmin: E165005: Expected repository
On 27.06.2020 15:04, Ben Elliston wrote:
> I was a very early SVN user. I have a repo last timestamped January
> 2003 that I want to get files and data out of. When I run svn upgrade,
> I get:
>
> svnadmin: E165005: Expected repository format '3' or '5'; found format '1'
Repository format 1 is re
