Re: Svnadmin dump with include will lost the svn:log in sometime

2020-03-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
钱海远(Nathan) wrote on Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:56 +: > The version is 1.10.6 , I was try to reproduce this issue. > > You can make a commit like this : > Revision 1 > A /test > A /Test/a.c > A /another > A /another/b.c > > Revision 2 > M /test/a.c > M /another/b.c > > Then run command : svnadmin d

答复: Svnadmin dump with include will lost the svn:log in sometime

2020-03-22 Thread Nathan
The version is 1.10.6 , I was try to reproduce this issue. You can make a commit like this : Revision 1 A /test A /Test/a.c A /another A /another/b.c Revision 2 M /test/a.c M /another/b.c Then run command : svnadmin dump svnroot include "/test" Then it will happen. Best Regards! Haiyuan Qian

Re: Svnadmin dump with include will lost the svn:log in sometime

2020-03-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:45 +: > 钱海远(Nathan) wrote on Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:30 +: > > The expected behaviour is: 'svnadmin dump' should include all properties. > > > > It happened in command : svnadmin dump --include . > > > > I organized the calling relationship of the fu

Re: Svnadmin dump with include will lost the svn:log in sometime

2020-03-22 Thread Daniel Shahaf
钱海远(Nathan) wrote on Mon, 23 Mar 2020 05:30 +: > The expected behaviour is: 'svnadmin dump' should include all properties. > > It happened in command : svnadmin dump --include . > > I organized the calling relationship of the function: I can't reproduce that: [[[ % lldb -- svnadmin dump r -

答复: Svnadmin dump with include will lost the svn:log in sometime

2020-03-22 Thread Nathan
Hi, Daniel , The expected behaviour is: 'svnadmin dump' should include all properties. It happened in command : svnadmin dump --include . I was very sure this will make a malformed dump when it work with include. I organized the calling relationship of the function: 1. svnadmin.c static svn_er

答复: Svnadmin dump with include can not dump the subdir into add when it's parent path was a branch

2020-03-22 Thread Nathan
Yes, I think so. It's just for include. It's not a very good patch, I think , sorry for this . And it has a known issue , it will include the parent node path , this is a problem. I made another program to delete parent node. Best Regards! Haiyuan Qian R & D Management Group Hangzhou Hikvision