Re: False conflict with interleaved merge commits

2020-02-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 09:57:47AM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > So, indeed, if there was a way to extend the heuristic to detect this case > the problem could be avoided. I suspect the heuristic only ever looks at > server-side mergeinfo and does not take mergeinfo in the local working copy > in

Re: False conflict with interleaved merge commits

2020-02-08 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 04:01:06AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > That's the desired result, isn't it? If so, is there an underlying rule > here that we could teach Subversion to follow automatically? The underlying issue is a decision made by the "automatic merge" heuristic. Note the output of t