Franz Sirl wrote on Tue, 24 Jul 2018 22:00 +0200:
> It turns out this is probably issue #4700 which for some reason was
> never approved for the 1.9 branch, even though it was already nominated
> last October. So the version that matters here is the server version.
> After I upgraded the server
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> I see you've now done this in r1836306. Any reason not to backport
> that? (Feel free to add my +1)
Nominated for 1.10.
--
Philip
Am 2018-07-21 um 16:27 schrieb Franz Sirl:
Am 2018-07-20 um 16:46 schrieb Franz Sirl:
Am 2018-07-20 um 15:55 schrieb Branko Čibej:
On 20.07.2018 15:37, Franz Sirl wrote:
Hi,
this already happened a few times here, but now I managed to re-create
it reliably.
This happens at least on Linux with