Re: No longer get multiple icons

2018-03-16 Thread M. Buecher
On 2018-03-16 17:53, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote: I've been using CVS and then when Subversion was doing well I switched.apparently from showing the log from a few things, I pretty much was switched over in 2007.  I've enjoyed using it until the most recent versionsboth Subversion and Wi

Re: No longer get multiple icons

2018-03-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Eric Johnson wrote: > Hi Victor, > > It sounds like you might be using TortoiseSVN. Most likely you'll get a > better answer asking people familiar with that project. This email list is > specifically for the core SVN functionality, not the GUI clients. >

Re: No longer get multiple icons

2018-03-16 Thread Eric Johnson
Hi Victor, It sounds like you might be using TortoiseSVN. Most likely you'll get a better answer asking people familiar with that project. This email list is specifically for the core SVN functionality, not the GUI clients. Eric. On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote: > I

No longer get multiple icons

2018-03-16 Thread Victor A. Wagner Jr.
I've been using CVS and then when Subversion was doing well I switched.apparently from showing the log from a few things, I pretty much was switched over in 2007.  I've enjoyed using it until the most recent versionsboth Subversion and Windows10. someplace along the line, I quit getting

Re: E130003: The XML response contains invalid XML - Follow-up

2018-03-16 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > Philip Martin wrote on Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:44 +: > > Changing "0" to "48" would also have broken the and > offsets in that revision file, so how come 'verify' worked after > that change? In the examples he gave it looks like the root node itself is being edited. Th

Re: E130003: The XML response contains invalid XML - Follow-up

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:44 +: > "NOCERA, ANDY" writes: > > > I used dump and load to debug the malformed node revision ID. Here > > are my steps and what learned. Looks like the revs' file text: entry > > has a zero instead of size. By just editing the size, verify worke

Re: E130003: The XML response contains invalid XML - Follow-up

2018-03-16 Thread Philip Martin
"NOCERA, ANDY" writes: > I used dump and load to debug the malformed node revision ID. Here > are my steps and what learned. Looks like the revs' file text: entry > has a zero instead of size. By just editing the size, verify worked. > No other change was required. The question is can we corr

fsfs 'structure' terminology: length/size v. size/expanded-size (was: Re: E130003: The XML response contains invalid XML - Follow-up)

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[ cc += dev@ ] NOCERA, ANDY wrote on Thu, 15 Mar 2018 22:35 +: > Folks, > > I used dump and load to debug the malformed node revision ID. Here are > my steps and what learned. Looks like the revs' file text: entry has > a zero instead of size. To be clear, you mean the fourth field.