On 24.12.2017 20:41, Anton Shepelev wrote:
> Brane to Anton Shepelev:
>
>>> Is it an error or expected behavior that local
>>> attribute to the copies of files that have the
>>> svn:needs-lock property and are marked as read-
>>> only in the woking copy at their original loca-
>>> tions?
>> I
Brane to Anton Shepelev:
> > Is it an error or expected behavior that local
> > attribute to the copies of files that have the
> > svn:needs-lock property and are marked as read-
> > only in the woking copy at their original loca-
> > tions?
>
> It's expected. The new file is essentially
On 24.12.2017 14:27, Anton Shepelev wrote:
> Hello, all
>
> Is it an error or expected behavior that local
> 'svn cp' on Windows does not assign the read-only
> attribute to the copies of files that have the
> svn:needs-lock property and are marked as read-only
> in the woking copy
Hello, all
Is it an error or expected behavior that local
'svn cp' on Windows does not assign the read-only
attribute to the copies of files that have the
svn:needs-lock property and are marked as read-only
in the woking copy at their original locations?
--
Please, do not forward
Stefan Sperling to Anton Shepelev:
> > The problem is still there with svn client
> > 1.9.7.
>
> If your problem is rooted in issue #4582 then
> 1.8.x clients have already created svn:mergeinfo
> properties which now confuse the reintegrate
> merge.
>
> Update *all* your client
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 01:35:35PM +0300, Anton Shepelev wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn:
>
> > This issue seems similar:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SVN-4582
> >
> > I found this in the list of CHANGES [1] for 1.9.0
> > (I went looking there, because I vaguely rem
Johan Corveleyn:
> This issue seems similar:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile#issue/SVN-4582
>
> I found this in the list of CHANGES [1] for 1.9.0
> (I went looking there, because I vaguely remem-
> bered seeing the issue before). So try again with
> a 1.9.x client, may
Mark Phippard to Anton Shepelev:
> > Stefan Sperling:
> >
> > > Which version of svn are you using to run this
> > > merge?
> >
> > 1.8.17 (r1770682) as part of CollabNet SVN. I
> > am not at all certain we need its extra fea-
> > tures, but someone else has decided to use that.
>
> FWIW, t