On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Nathan Hartman
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>
>> Not wanting to start a flame war, but for all svn users and admins out
>> there that sometimes need to have this conversation ... I found this to be a
>> very nice website:
>>
>>
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:12 -0400:
> > I tried on two occasions to subscribe to that mailing list but there
> seemed
> > to be no response. Does anyone know why or have contact with the book
> > maintainers?
>
> I've forwa
Nathan Hartman wrote on Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:12 -0400:
> I tried on two occasions to subscribe to that mailing list but there seemed
> to be no response. Does anyone know why or have contact with the book
> maintainers?
I've forwarded Nathan's report to svnbook-dev@ (and verified that my email
was
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Daniel Shahaf
wrote:
> Todd Armstrong wrote on Wed, 19 Jul 2017 19:22 +:
> > There’s a 1.8 draft in the nightly build section of that page with a
> 2016 copyright that I’ve been using.
> >
> > It’s not available in PDF form yet, though.
>
> Requests for a PDF
Hi, Stefan,
Thanks for your feedback! Please see my response inline.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:01:55PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> The FreeBSD repository is one of the best real world data sets available
> to Subversion developers. I have re
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 08:01:55PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> Since the article mentioned FreeBSD (I'm a FreeBSD developer, and I
> use both git and subversion everyday), I think I need to point out
> that the author have missed some important pain points.
>
> My biggest pain point with subversion is
