On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 14:32 PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Hi Hugo,
>
> Subversion only supports Unicode it if is encoded as UTF-8.
>
> Unicode represented in encodings other than UTF-8 is usually treated like
a binary file. Fixing this would be a major effort.
> See https://issues.apache.org
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 01:38:02PM +0100, Hugo González wrote:
> Apart from that, I tried to fix the diff file myself, just to check if the
> error was only during the generation of the diff file or also to apply an
> Unicode diff file. I edited the changes.diff file using Notepad++ and
> removed
Apart from that, I tried to fix the diff file myself, just to check if the
error was only during the generation of the diff file or also to apply an
Unicode diff file. I edited the changes.diff file using Notepad++ and
removed the \0 codes, so I had an ANSI diff file called
changes_fixed.diff
Hello, and congratulations for your great job at the Subversion project. I
think it is an amazing tool.
I have found a bug when trying to apply a patch over a Unicode file. The
steps to reproduce this bug are:
1. Create and version a Unicode file in your repository, for example:
MyFavour
On 25.11.2016 11:46, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:37:10AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 25.11.2016 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11:15AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Wouldn't it be good if svnserve supported encryption directly?
>>> s
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:37:10AM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 25.11.2016 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11:15AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> >> Wouldn't it be good if svnserve supported encryption directly?
> > svnserve does support encryption directly, but n
On 25.11.2016 11:33, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11:15AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be good if svnserve supported encryption directly?
> svnserve does support encryption directly, but not with TLS.
> Instead, it uses SASL for this purpose.
Um. SASL is us
On 25.11.2016 11:29, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 25.11.2016 11:11, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be good if svnserve supported encryption directly?
>> It would be a moderately nice-to-have feature, but given that stunnel
>> exis
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:11:15AM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm running svnserve on a Debian VM on my PC. I'd like to
> move it to a server on the internet but I don't get how to do this
> securely.
> Svnserve doesn't support encryption, right, so I can't expose it on a
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 25.11.2016 11:11, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Currently I'm running svnserve on a Debian VM on my PC. I'd like to
>> move it to a server on the internet but I don't get how to do this
>> securely.
>> Svnserve doesn't support encr
On 25.11.2016 11:11, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm running svnserve on a Debian VM on my PC. I'd like to
> move it to a server on the internet but I don't get how to do this
> securely.
> Svnserve doesn't support encryption, right, so I can't expose it on a
> public port directly
Hi,
Currently I'm running svnserve on a Debian VM on my PC. I'd like to
move it to a server on the internet but I don't get how to do this
securely.
Svnserve doesn't support encryption, right, so I can't expose it on a
public port directly.
I'm aware of Subversion via Apache but I don't run Apache
12 matches
Mail list logo
