Branko Čibej wrote:
> Please file a bug with the reproduction script.
OK, the issue number is SVN-4642.
Thanks
On 07.07.2016 12:36, Jim Barry wrote:
> Branko Čibej writes:
>> I can reproduce this with 1.9.4 and trunk ... definitely a bug, only
>> dir/subdir2 should be left (since dir/subdir2 is unversioned content of
>> dir).
> Thanks Brane. Would it be possible for an svn dev to take this on?
>
> By the wa
Branko Čibej writes:
> I can reproduce this with 1.9.4 and trunk ... definitely a bug, only
> dir/subdir2 should be left (since dir/subdir2 is unversioned content of
> dir).
Thanks Brane. Would it be possible for an svn dev to take this on?
By the way, I just checked it with 1.8.16 and everything