Stefan Sperling wrote on Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 22:26:31 +0200:
> It just needs one more vote from a committer to make it in,
> and no vetoes.
It needs no more votes: bindings changes require one +1 and one +0, and
r1683266 has that. You can move the change to the "Approved" section.
This means r1
Andrew Reedick wrote on Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 20:00:02 +:
> However, I'm not sure what the pros/cons of packing are in regards to rsync.
Packing a repository moves revision data from the existing files to new
files: it basically concatenates each 1000 revision files into a single
file.
I think
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:21:30AM +, Ioannis Kappas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you please kindly consider picking up the fix with revision 1683266
> (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1683266) in the
> next patch/official subversion release?
It has been nominated for 1.9.5.
Hello,
Can you please kindly consider picking up the fix with revision 1683266
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1683266) in the
next patch/official subversion release?
It fixes a long standing issue in the subversion Perl bindings, whereby
a client stressing the interface
