Re: which version control supports file locking and who has it locked

2016-06-13 Thread Doug Robinson
Johan: On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Doug Robinson > wrote: > > > > Johan: > > > > The "svn lock" enables all people considering working with a file to > > be able to see who currently has the file locked. But they cannot see > > any

Re: which version control supports file locking and who has it locked

2016-06-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Doug Robinson wrote: > > Johan: > > The "svn lock" enables all people considering working with a file to > be able to see who currently has the file locked. But they cannot see > anyone who is working on the file but does not own the lock. > > Reading the "p4 edit

Re: svn:mergeinfo updated for unchanged files/folders at merge of a feature branch to trunk - is this desirable?

2016-06-13 Thread Stefan Hett
On 6/12/2016 12:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote: On 12.06.2016 10:06, Yves Martin wrote: On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 02:11 +0200, Branko Čibej wrote: It's not a result of merge of individual folders. I find the pattern in the log for commits I've done and I have most definitely not gone out of my way to e

Re: which version control supports file locking and who has it locked

2016-06-13 Thread Doug Robinson
Johan: The "svn lock" enables all people considering working with a file to be able to see who currently has the file locked. But they cannot see anyone who is working on the file but does not own the lock. Reading the "p4 edit" man page: https://www.perforce.com/perforce/r16.1/manuals/cmdref/p

Re: Is there a way to 'sparsify' a working copy, without starting over?

2016-06-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:04:13 +0200: > But if you have local moves, it seems the 'Delete' part of the move is > lost when updating to depth empty, and the move is broken (converted > into just the A+ of the "Add" part). > > This looks like a bug in "update --set-depth" (lo

Re: bug

2016-06-13 Thread Andreas Stieger
Update to 1.8.12 or 1.9.4 and try again. https://sourceforge.net/projects/tortoisesvn/files/1.8.12/Application/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/tortoisesvn/files/1.9.4/Application/   Andreas Gesendet: Montag, 13. Juni 2016 um 10:05 Uhr Von: lemon An: users@subversion.apache.org Betreff: bug ---

bug

2016-06-13 Thread lemon
--- Subversion Exception! --- Subversion encountered a serious problem. Please take the time to report this on the Subversion mailing list with as much information as possible about what you were trying to do. But please first search the mailing list

Re: Is there a way to 'sparsify' a working copy, without starting over?

2016-06-13 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:39 AM, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.06.2016 01:24, Johan Corveleyn wrote: >> I have a (full depth infinity) working copy: >> >> parent >> \-- sub1 >> \-- sub2 >> >> I'd like to make it sparse, throwing out sub2, so it becomes: >> >> parent (empty) >>