On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:25:42AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Then, when ready to switchover, make a good backup of the old system,
>> *LOCK IT* to prevent any further ocmmits, and switch services to the
>> new server. You should be
I'm trying to get a Linux svn client to work with a VisualSVN server that
has Basic authentication disabled. I've set up Kerberos on the Linux box;
I can get a ticket via kinit, join the domain, and I see service tickets
for cifs and ldap in klist after joining, so I _think_ that part is OK,
altho
Bert Huijben wrote:
>I'm not sure where you read that, but subversion can upgrade working copies
>all the way up from 1.0. (See our compatibility guarantee)
perhapse here:
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.9.html#wc-upgrade
>>Subversion 1.9 can only upgrade working copies created
On 22.03.2016 12:36, Manju C wrote:
> Yes, We had two directives, and /svn_old>. we removed the still same issue.
>
> But if we change the to or
> even to its working fine.
/svn is a proper prefix of /svn_old, that's what's confusing httpd. Your
Location directives should read:
...
an
Yes, We had two directives, and . we removed the still same issue.
But if we change the to or
even to its working fine.
--
View this message in context:
http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/mod-dav-svn-nested-Location-svn-hinders-access-to-in-SVNPath-Location-svn-tp196311p1963
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:25:42AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Then, when ready to switchover, make a good backup of the old system,
> *LOCK IT* to prevent any further ocmmits, and switch services to the
> new server. You should be able to activate a proxy or port forwarding
> for the old ser
I'm not sure where you read that, but subversion can upgrade working copies
all the way up from 1.0. (See our compatibility guarantee)
There is one exception: If a working copy operation was stopped halfway. in
this case you need to run 'svn cleanup' with your older Subversion version
(or 1.6.x
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Bob Berger wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Stefan. It's very much appreciated.
>
> Before Subversion 1.8 made the reintegrate merge automatic, I was doing
> merges without the reintegrate option, which were, I suppose, inappropriate
> "complete merges". They were
