files always reported as reverted for different owner

2016-02-14 Thread Oleksiy Zagorskyi
Is that ok? When I do "svn revert" using for example "root" account, but files in the folder are owned by different user, then every file is reported as reverted but actually there is nothing to be reverted? Such wrong messages mislead a lot! An example: root@it0:/zab/www-dev/trunk# whoami ro

Re: Commit Error using ms onedrive repo

2016-02-14 Thread Joseph Bruni
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:26 AM, dennisj2 wrote: > > Thanks Bert, - > > Ok, so, then I really need a cloud based repository. Do you have any > recommendations on setting up shoestring cloud based svn repository? Beanstalkapp.com provides low cost SVN hosting.

RE: Commit Error using ms onedrive repo

2016-02-14 Thread dennisj2
Thanks Bert, - Ok, so, then I really need a cloud based repository. Do you have any recommendations on setting up shoestring cloud based svn repository? -- View this message in context: http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.com/Commit-Error-using-ms-onedrive-repo-tp196123p196129.html Sent from t

RE: Commit Error using ms onedrive repo

2016-02-14 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: dennisj2 [mailto:djorge...@gmail.com] > Sent: zondag 14 februari 2016 01:22 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Commit Error using ms onedrive repo > > I have a basic cloud setup, primary windows 10 client with onedrive > installed, and a remote serv

Re: Apache 2.4, Worker MPM, SVN 1.7.20, MOD_DAV_SVN and Post-Commit Hooks

2016-02-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Steffen Moser wrote on Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 17:24:16 +0100: > After learning this, I had a look at the HTTPS part of my site-specific > Apache configuration (/etc/apache2/2.4/sites.d/...). There I found a > strange configuration line: > > SSLCryptoDevice pkcs11 For future reference, you can run

Re: (unknown)

2016-02-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Michal Matyl wrote on Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:19:02 +: > The example is about a simple branch merging with default settings and > a classic conflict situation, no fancy features or complex > trunk-to-branch back merging, so I belive simple prose description of > the problem is enough. The pros