Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository

2016-02-01 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On 01.02.2016 11:11, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:06:19AM +, Philip Martin wrote: Stefan Fuhrmann writes: So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread). I suppose format 7 might allow us to

RE: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository

2016-02-01 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: maandag 1 februari 2016 11:11 > To: Philip Martin > Cc: Stefan Fuhrmann ; Gert Kello > ; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016

Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository

2016-02-01 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:06:19AM +, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed > > (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread). > > I suppose format 7 might allow us to implement a system that fixes >

Re: Svn 1.9 repository 20% bigger than svn 1.8 repository

2016-02-01 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > So, all user content is there and merely the deduplication failed > (as already being investigated elsewhere in this thread). I suppose format 7 might allow us to implement a system that fixes missing deduplication during packing. -- Philip Martin WANdisco