Dear all,
it would be helpful if someone could reproduce/confirm the behavior. This
would be an important step towards a bug report.
Thanks and best regards,
Christian
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Christian K.
wrote:
> Hello Bert,
>
> thanks for your reply. From my understanding svn does s
On 2015-Apr-13, Bert Huijben wrote with possible deletions:
> >
> > Current access file contains:
> >
> > [groups]
> > proj_staff = [...]
> > proj_other = [...]
> >
> > [proj:/]
> > @proj_staff = rw
> > @proj_other = r
> >
> > [proj:/pub]
> > * = r
> > @proj_
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Pete Harlan wrote:
>> My scripts are Bash scripts similar to the script I originally posted
>> to this thread. I can share them if you think that would be useful,
>> or I'm happy to rerun them against other versions upon request.
...
> Attached. Disclaimer: they
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Pete Harlan wrote:
>> Julian Foad wrote:
> [...]
>>> Another way to help would be to think about how the client could
>>> present the "WC is in a merged state" notion, and how that would
>>> affect various operations. Just assume that we can im
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 11.04.2015 02:01, Pete Harlan wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Julian Foad
>> wrote:
>>> Pete Harlan wrote:
>> ...
If you have suggestions for how I could further help this issue along,
please let me know. And thanks
Pete Harlan wrote:
> Julian Foad wrote:
[...]
>> Another way to help would be to think about how the client could
>> present the "WC is in a merged state" notion, and how that would
>> affect various operations. Just assume that we can implement it, and
>> imagine how it should behave in order to b
Hi Pete. Just one quick point before I take the time to digest
everything else...
Pete Harlan wrote:
> I wrote a list of cases I could think of to test, and tested them
> against 1.8.13.
[...]
> FAILED: dir-add-add.sh (Dir of same name added to both sides.)
> FAILED: dir-copy-add.sh (Same, only
> -Original Message-
> From: all-li...@stefan-klinger.de [mailto:all-li...@stefan-klinger.de]
> Sent: zondag 12 april 2015 12:47
> To: users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Path-based authorization ignores most specific path
>
> Hello!
>
> --Summary--
>
> Path-based authorization seem