Hello,
> So i have tried to read the RDC docs, but it doesnt make any sense -
> it tells alot about how the configuration should look, but not how to
> implement the feature...
To implement, set versioned properties named svn:auto-props in the repository.
See help about propset, propedit com
Hello Andreas+
So i have tried to read the RDC docs, but it doesnt make any sense -
it tells alot about how the configuration should look, but not how to
implement the feature...
I realize that the clientside can still be modified accordingly, and I
want to push/enforce the keyword config
Hello,
> i want to define autoprops (serverside dicated) for some repos in my
> large SVN installation. However it have been missed out in the
> documentation how this is achieved. The docs rely on a "config file",
> but not a name to it, so i tried and make a
> $REPOS_NAME/conf/[repons.co
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your reply at
the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text is preferred, but
I'll manage :-). See more below ... ]
[ Understood... too many mailing lists.. ]
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
hello svn-server-experts,
i want to define autoprops (serverside dicated) for some repos in my
large SVN installation. However it have been missed out in the
documentation how this is achieved. The docs rely on a "config file",
but not a name to it, so i tried and make a
$REPOS_NAME/con
[ Followup trimmed to subersion-devel and subversion-users ]
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> I'm happy to announce the release of Apache Subversion 1.7.20.
>
> This release addresses two security issues:
>
> CVE-2015-0248: Subversion mod_dav_svn and svnserve are vulner
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> So, what will a mod_dav fix look like? I understand the issue is that
> it walks the copy source for locks. Should it stop doing that?
Yes, I believe so. mod_dav should avoid the walk when the callback
result for every path in the walk is known in advance. I spoke to
[ As an aside: this list prefers bottom-posting (i.e. putting your
reply at the bottom) or inline replying, if possible. Also, plain-text
is preferred, but I'll manage :-). See more below ... ]
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
> Here is some more info:
>
> First I show the
[ moving to dev@, please remove users@ from replies ]
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 19:57:34 +0200:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> > Httpd's mod_dav was updated in some recent version to do a full lock
> > traversal on copies and moves. I think we already
On 01.04.2015 08:58, Matthew Durandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having issues with SVN authenticating my users against my users
> file. SVN was working yesterday morning, I then created a new user
> account on the SVN server and created a new SVN user using the
> htpasswd command. Since then my subversio
Hi,
I'm having issues with SVN authenticating my users against my users file.
SVN was working yesterday morning, I then created a new user account on the
SVN server and created a new SVN user using the htpasswd command. Since
then my subversion is no longer authenticating my users from the users
f
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 2:19 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> ...
>> I think I've found a workaround: it seems the tree walk by mod_dav is
>> avoided when the request has a header Depth with value 0. I've tried
>> adding
>>
>>
>>
12 matches
Mail list logo
