Yes, we probably should.
The problem here is an editor that drives a file or directory add in a location
that already has a BASE (‘status normal’) node. That should never happen,
because the reporter just told the server that this node is there).
But github only uses some bits of the reporter
On 14 March 2015 at 22:57, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for noting that this is related to the github implementation.
>
> When Subversion recovers from an so called ‘incomplete’ update, it sends
> other information to the server, but the github Subversion compatibility
> co
