Well I got around to creating the script mentioned in the course of this
thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201304.mbox/%
3C1366208597.20370.18.camel%40nimble.325Bayport%3E
As originally intended, this script helps to view a patch file w/out
touching an existing work
On Friday, September 12, 2014 01:07:53 pm Ben Reser wrote:
> On 9/12/14 12:16 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > I did a bit of bisection, and it turns out that 1.8.0 was working
> > properly, but 1.8.1 and higher all segfault as described above.
> >
> > Hope that helps.
>
> With the WANdisco builds or
On 9/12/14 12:16 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> I did a bit of bisection, and it turns out that 1.8.0 was working properly,
> but 1.8.1 and higher all segfault as described above.
>
> Hope that helps.
With the WANdisco builds or any builds? The only differences between 1.8.0 and
1.8.1 that impacts
On 9/12/14 11:54 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 12.09.2014 20:37, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> Alexey Neyman writes:
>>>
Rather, I think, it is that the libsvn_swig_perl-1.so.0 does not list the
_Core.so as a dependency:
>>> I don't think that's the way it works.
On Friday, September 12, 2014 12:06:27 pm Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:57:14 am Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:53:37 am Philip Martin wrote:
> > > Alexey Neyman writes:
> > > > 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> > > > (gdb) bt
> > > > #0 0x7fff
On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:57:14 am Alexey Neyman wrote:
> On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:53:37 am Philip Martin wrote:
> > Alexey Neyman writes:
> > > 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> > > #1 0x003bba01899e in run_cleanups (pool=0x8d78
On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:53:37 am Philip Martin wrote:
> Alexey Neyman writes:
> > 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> > #1 0x003bba01899e in run_cleanups (pool=0x8d7828) at
> > memory/unix/apr_pools.c:2314
> > #2 apr_pool_destroy (pool=0x8d
On 12.09.2014 20:37, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> Alexey Neyman writes:
>>
>>> Rather, I think, it is that the libsvn_swig_perl-1.so.0 does not list the
>>> _Core.so as a dependency:
>> I don't think that's the way it works. When Perl uses a module such as
>> SVN::Repos the
Alexey Neyman writes:
> 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7138af10 in ?? ()
> #1 0x003bba01899e in run_cleanups (pool=0x8d7828) at
> memory/unix/apr_pools.c:2314
> #2 apr_pool_destroy (pool=0x8d7828) at memory/unix/apr_pools.c:782
> #3 0x003bba018975 in apr_pool_d
On Friday, September 12, 2014 11:16:12 am Philip Martin wrote:
> Alexey Neyman writes:
> > Rather, I think, it is that the libsvn_swig_perl-1.so.0 does not list the
>
> > _Core.so as a dependency:
> I don't think that's the way it works. When Perl uses a module such as
> SVN::Repos then Perl its
Philip Martin writes:
> Alexey Neyman writes:
>
>> Rather, I think, it is that the libsvn_swig_perl-1.so.0 does not list the
>> _Core.so as a dependency:
>
> I don't think that's the way it works. When Perl uses a module such as
> SVN::Repos then Perl itself knows to uses SVN::Core as a depend
Alexey Neyman writes:
> Rather, I think, it is that the libsvn_swig_perl-1.so.0 does not list the
> _Core.so as a dependency:
I don't think that's the way it works. When Perl uses a module such as
SVN::Repos then Perl itself knows to uses SVN::Core as a dependency.
That causes the shared objec
On Friday, September 12, 2014 09:45:32 am Philip Martin wrote:
> Alexey Neyman writes:
> > I tried to update subversion to 1.8.10 on a freshly installed CentOS 6.5
> > and noticed that an attempt to use Perl bindings has failed due to an
> > undefined symbol in the libsvn_swig_perl library:
> > sv
Alexey Neyman writes:
> I tried to update subversion to 1.8.10 on a freshly installed CentOS 6.5 and
> noticed that an attempt to use Perl bindings has failed due to an undefined
> symbol in the libsvn_swig_perl library: svn_swig_pl_get_current_pool
>
> $ readelf -Ws /tmp/usr/lib64/libsvn_swig_
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Thomas Harold
wrote:
> I have a question about how efficient SVN is at de-duplication within a
> repository with regards to files that appear in multiple locations, but
> which have the same content.
>
> I know a small improvement was made in 1.8...
>
> http://su
I have a question about how efficient SVN is at de-duplication within a
repository with regards to files that appear in multiple locations, but
which have the same content.
I know a small improvement was made in 1.8...
http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#fsfs-enhancements
>
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 12.09.2014 09:31, Kim Gräsman wrote:
>
>> This is not a problem for us, but it would be nice if one could
>> somehow perform authorization both before and after the precommit
>> hook.
>
> Did you mean authentication or authorization?
Autho
Johan,
Absolutely, I should have included that in my original email. I've
downloaded the latest available specifically for my testing environment so svn
--version does indeed come back with 1.8.10.
John Vaux
Enterprise Infrastructure Architect
Information Technology Services
Phoenix Chi
On 12.09.2014 09:31, Kim Gräsman wrote:
> Hello ,
>
> I've seen the discussion on rewriting transactions with svnadmin, so
> it sounds like this scenario might be less esoteric in the future.
>
> I just wanted to reiterate one thing that you might also want to think about:
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 a
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:29:37AM +0200, milan_plan...@swissre.com wrote:
> Dear team,
>
> I tried to commit my changes with following error message:
>
> Error:Cannot run program "C:\srdev\tool\SVN_CLIENT_1.8.8\svn.exe" (in
> directory
> "C:\Users\S3F96Q\work\sources\g10ct\SR_G10_CT\modules\sr
Dear team,
I tried to commit my changes with following error message:
Error:Cannot run program "C:\srdev\tool\SVN_CLIENT_1.8.8\svn.exe" (in
directory
"C:\Users\S3F96Q\work\sources\g10ct\SR_G10_CT\modules\sr-g10-ct-batch-xd\src\main\resources"):
CreateProcess error=206, The filename or extensi
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Vaux, John wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> It’s my first time posting to this list and I am not
> subscribed so please CC me on any replies.
>
>
>
> I’m having difficulty with the proxy settings in Windows
> version of svn (I’m using the WA
Hello ,
I've seen the discussion on rewriting transactions with svnadmin, so
it sounds like this scenario might be less esoteric in the future.
I just wanted to reiterate one thing that you might also want to think about:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Kim Gräsman wrote:
> One snag is that it
23 matches
Mail list logo
