Hello all,
It's my first time posting to this list and I am not subscribed
so please CC me on any replies.
I'm having difficulty with the proxy settings in Windows
version of svn (I'm using the WANdisco compiled version). It seems as though
no matter what I put
I ran "svnadmin verify *repository_dir*" and it shows everything is ok (
"verified revision 312" and exits cleanly without any error).
As the next step I have checked the event logs of visual svn server. It
shows
Cant open file D:\\Repositories\\myProj\\db\\revprops\\0\\28: access
denied. [500, #
Thanks Stefan, I found the problem, it was me. First off I am the only
developer here, so I suspected I did something. I also try to leave meaningful
comments which helped out in this case. After reading the comments produced by
the log command I remember seeing some files that subversion 'fo
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:03:36PM +, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, John,
>
> I guess Stefans question for more details was directed to Andreas and his
> rather unspecific rant, not to your email.
Correct :)
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:56:22AM +, John Maher wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Stefan. There are no subdirs on either my trunk or
> branches. The command I used was (from the working copy of (for example)
> https://server/svn/erp/trunk) svn merge
> https://server/svn/erp/branches/feature.
Hi, John,
I guess Stefans question for more details was directed to Andreas and his
rather unspecific rant, not to your email.
Best regards
Markus Schaber
CODESYS® a trademark of 3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Inspiring Automation Solutions
3S-Smart Software Solutions GmbH
Dipl.-Inf. Marku
Thanks for your reply Stefan. There are no subdirs on either my trunk or
branches. The command I used was (from the working copy of (for example)
https://server/svn/erp/trunk) svn merge
https://server/svn/erp/branches/feature.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@el
I sent lots of details. If you can't see them then perhaps something is buggy
with the help system. The conflicts were either "local add, incoming add upon
merge" or " local delete, incoming delete upon merge"
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: Wedne
