Hello,
On 07/07/14 18:01, Kamil Libich wrote:
> I was given an assembly which comes from different repo to be used in
> my project. I added the assembly to my repo writing in comment field
> the source of origin.
>
> However, is there any other way to copy/link the assembly along with
> putting t
Hi,
I was given an assembly which comes from different repo to be used in
my project. I added the assembly to my repo writing in comment field
the source of origin.
However, is there any other way to copy/link the assembly along with
putting the information in the 'Copied from' field - as the 'C
I thought I understood status and revert, but the following experience makes me
question if I am missing something.
I attempted a merge from one branch of our development environment and based on
"svn status" after the merge, I had gotten some unexpected results, so I used
"svn revert . --rec
On 07.07.2014 15:37, Notes Jonny wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 07.07.2014 15:23, Notes Jonny wrote:
>>> Hi Guys
>>> Have you thought about adding [svn users] to prefix the subject of emails?
>> Yes, and we shied away from the idea in sheer terror.
>>
>>> It wou
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Notes Jonny wrote:
>> Hi Mark
>>
>> You are right that I did have 1.8.x installed. Which I downgraded to
>> this version:
>>
>> TortoiseSVN 1.7.7, Build 22907 - 32 Bit , 2012/05/15 12:16:05
>> Subversion 1.7.5,
>>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Notes Jonny wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Andy Levy wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Notes Jonny wrote:
>>> Hi Mark
>>>
>>> You are right that I did have 1.8.x installed. Which I downgraded to
>>> this version:
>>>
>>> TortoiseSVN 1.7.7, Build
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 07.07.2014 15:23, Notes Jonny wrote:
>> Hi Guys
>> Have you thought about adding [svn users] to prefix the subject of emails?
>
> Yes, and we shied away from the idea in sheer terror.
>
>> It would make my mailbox simpler to prioritise all e
On 07.07.2014 15:23, Notes Jonny wrote:
> Hi Guys
> Have you thought about adding [svn users] to prefix the subject of emails?
Yes, and we shied away from the idea in sheer terror.
> It would make my mailbox simpler to prioritise all emails.. Currently
> I need to read the subjects.. or implement
Hi Guys
Have you thought about adding [svn users] to prefix the subject of emails?
It would make my mailbox simpler to prioritise all emails.. Currently
I need to read the subjects.. or implement some complex filtering to
folder of svn users emails..
Thanks for considering this.
Regards
Jon
On 07.07.2014 14:11, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 07.07.2014 12:48, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 06.07.2014 23:54, Andreas Stieger wrote:
Berkeley DB databases can always be up
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 07.07.2014 12:48, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> On 06.07.2014 23:54, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>>> Berkeley DB databases can always be upgraded from older BDB versions with
>>> db_upgrade,
Hi,
I am trying to setup Subversion authentication through Active Directory
authentication and authorization through Active Directory groups.Everything
is working fine but the issue I am facing is when I want to restrict access
to subdirectorys of a subversion repository. For ex: there is a repo w
On 07.07.2014 12:48, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 06.07.2014 23:54, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>>
>> On 06/07/14 21:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>> On 06.07.2014 13:35, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>>
>> Your repository is of type bdb, (berkeley db backe
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 06.07.2014 23:54, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>
> On 06/07/14 21:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> On 06.07.2014 13:35, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>
> Your repository is of type bdb, (berkeley db backend), not fsfs. As such
> is it not suitable for a direc
On 06.07.2014 23:54, Andreas Stieger wrote:
> On 06/07/14 21:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 06.07.2014 13:35, Andreas Stieger wrote:
>>> Your repository is of type bdb, (berkeley db backend), not fsfs. As such
>>> is it not suitable for a direct upgrade.
>> That's nonsense.
> See DB_VERSION_MISMATCH
15 matches
Mail list logo