Hi Stefan,
Thanks for the explanation - I always forget about the subtleties of using
-r versus @. I now understand what Subversion is doing here and why,
but I maintain that it should give some indication that the workspace is not
pointing at the "expected" repository location. Yes, it's the res
On 19.06.2014 05:11, Geoff Field wrote:
>> From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
>> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Geoff Field wrote:
>>
>>> In our duplication effort, we also set all the permissions
>>> on the old repositories to read-only, to limit the chances
>>> of cross-contamination.
> Just to be clear,
