On Thu, 22 May 2014 20:08:15 +, David DL wrote:
...
> It's my understanding that if you want the process to integrate a new vendor
> drop to be sane, the update ideally should be expressed as a series of "svn
> actions" (add/update/etc.) so that history is maintained.
>
> The obvious optio
Hi Andreas,
>> What are the currently accepted best practices / tools for maintaining
> > "vendor" branches?
> >
> > I've seen the page at:
> > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.vendorbr.html
> >
> > I ask about updated guidance since:
> >
> > 1) I notice some (?) churn for th
Hello all,
[Repost with formatting fixed. Misbehaving email client. ]
What are the currently accepted best practices / tools for maintaining "vendor"
branches? Particularly where maintaining patches against vendor drops is
expected.
I've seen the page at:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/s
> On 22 May 2014, at 18:55, D D L wrote:
>
> What are the currently accepted best practices / tools for maintaining
> "vendor" branches?
>
> I've seen the page at:
> http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.vendorbr.html
>
> I ask about updated guidance since:
>
> 1) I notice some (?
Hello all,
What are the currently accepted best practices / tools for maintaining "vendor"
branches?
I've seen the page
at:http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.vendorbr.html
I ask about updated guidance since:
1) I notice some (?) churn for this section in the SVN Book
repository:http
>
>
> --parents is implemented by the client. The client first builds up a
> transaction on the server and then tells the server to attempt to commit
> the transaction. Without --parents the copy fails while building the
> transaction so no attempt is made to commit the transaction. With
> --par
Dan Ellis writes:
> I don't quite follow what the different checks would be as in this case the
> only difference is --parents vs no --parents. Both I imagine do a path
> existence check and in both cases the path doesn't exist. In the end, it
> really doesn't matter - its a general curiosity o
On May 22, 2014, at 10:16, Dan Ellis wrote:
>> The pre-commit hook script is only called if Subversion's internal checks
>> already passed; if the internal checks fail, there's no reason to call the
>> pre-commit hook script since the commit will fail regardless of the hook
>> script's outcome.
>
> The pre-commit hook script is only called if Subversion's internal checks
> already passed; if the internal checks fail, there's no reason to call the
> pre-commit hook script since the commit will fail regardless of the hook
> script's outcome.
>
> The internal check that failed in this case w
Hi,
In a recent thread I've been trying to figure out the best way to deal with
case sensitivity issues (in particular, finding out the clashing case
sensitive path). It doesn't appear that I'll be able to solve that one
readily, so I plan to convert all our existing mixed case entries to lower
c
The error is raised in ‘svn.exe’, not inside the python code.
I don’t know what makes this code fail for you. The checkout appears to work
for me.
Can you send me the dump file, to allow looking at this in more details?
(With the symbols .zip file from the SlikSvn website this should prov
Hi,
I am running
https://trac.inf.ethz.ch/trac/meyer/eve/browser/trunk/eve/eve.py
this to install and compile eve. I am using Python 2.7 and windows 8.1
I don't know why is it giving me this subversion error.
Please help me.
Thanks
--
Manav Kedia
Undergraduate Sophomore Student
Department of Com
On May 22, 2014 7:02 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> I didn't get a response from you so I've filed an issue:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4506
Sorry for not responding. I've been a bit busy and had not gotten back to
this. Thanks for filling the issue for me.
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:59:53PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:25:29PM +, Kevin Cathcart wrote:
> > What s going on here? Am I fundamentally misunderstanding
> > something or are these really bugs?
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> thank you for your very detailed bug report.
Stefan Sperling,
Tortoise SVN client working fine with Apache 2.2.24 now everything seems to
be fine. Thanks for your all support without you this was not possible.
Regards
Mohsin Abbas
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 07:28:34PM +0500, Mohsin
15 matches
Mail list logo
