On 26.04.2014 00:51, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> To stray off topic for a minute here, though: the idea that working copies
>> are "cheap throwaway stuff" is less than universally true. I've seen complex
>> sparse working copies with many gigabyt
On 4/24/14, 6:40 PM, Roman Naumenko wrote:
> And nfs as well, please (sorry for hijacking the thread).
>
> Perfomance on nfs is just terrible (for all svn client versions).
> Take any linux box, checkout to local fs and checkout to nfs vol: you gonna be
> amazed.
>
> The nfs thing should be a big
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> Working copies are supposed to be throwaway things that can always be
> fixed to the last commit by the server. Why wouldn't you want to use
> something fast, cheap, and highly buffered for that, even if it is
> half baked?
>
>
> Conversely,
On 25.04.2014 23:02, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> If you absolutely must put your working copies or repositories on non-local
>> storage, you should use a SAN with a real, multi-homed distributed
>> filesystem. Anything else is half-baked, at least
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
> If you absolutely must put your working copies or repositories on non-local
> storage, you should use a SAN with a real, multi-homed distributed
> filesystem. Anything else is half-baked, at least as far as data integrity
> is concerned.
W
On 25.04.2014 21:52, Naumenko, Roman wrote:
> Hello SVN users,
>
> We're looking to integrate svn access info into some reporting
> systems, but its almost impossible to use information from svnaccess
> to join with other sources.
> The reason is that there are no structured relation between groups
On 25.04.2014 19:09, Roman Naumenko wrote:
>> That was a known consequence of moving to SQLite for storage of the
>> metadata. SVN 1.8 offers a solution for those that can use it:
>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.8.html#exclusivelocking
> Mark, thank for the link. There is inde
Hello SVN users,
We're looking to integrate svn access info into some reporting systems, but its
almost impossible to use information from svnaccess to join with other sources.
The reason is that there are no structured relation between groups, users,
repositories and permissions.
So I'm lookin
You said "Last night we upgraded our server to 1.8.8". I am simply saying
that upgrading the server would not change the usernames your clients were
authenticating with.
If you also upgrade the clients, then that could be relevant but you never
mentioned upgrading the clients.
If you have Apache
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> It couldn't have changed. As you said, you upgraded your server but the
> username comes from the clients.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Tom Kielty wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>> On F
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Roman Naumenko < ro...@naumenko.ca
> > wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Mark Phippard <
> > > markp...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > I remember this. The deadly operation was the initial c
It couldn't have changed. As you said, you upgraded your server but the
username comes from the clients.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Tom Kielty wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tom Kielty wrote:
>>
>>> Last night we u
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tom Kielty wrote:
>
>> Last night we upgraded our server to 1.8.8. Everything smooth. However,
>> we are seeing some strange behavior regarding usernames.
>>
>> Issue 1: One of my users on a Win 7 64 bit ma
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Tom Kielty wrote:
> Last night we upgraded our server to 1.8.8. Everything smooth. However, we
> are seeing some strange behavior regarding usernames.
>
> Issue 1: One of my users on a Win 7 64 bit machine, uses the SVN CLI as
> his client. Before the upgrade he w
Last night we upgraded our server to 1.8.8. Everything smooth. However, we
are seeing some strange behavior regarding usernames.
Issue 1: One of my users on a Win 7 64 bit machine, uses the SVN CLI as his
client. Before the upgrade he was working fine. After the upgrade he keeps
getting a forbidde
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Roman Naumenko wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Mark Phippard
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Florian Ludwig
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >> this topic was raised several times in the past -
- Original Message -
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Mark Phippard
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Florian Ludwig
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> this topic was raised several times in the past - the answers
> >> range from
> >> "will be better/solved in the next version 1
Guys
I need to get this code from below URL
http://www.mirthcorp.com/community/wiki/display/mirth/Developing+Mirth+Conne
ct+in+Eclipse
Steps I have performed:-
1. Open this link
2. https://svn.mirthcorp.com/connect/
3. https://svn.mirthcorp.com/co
On Apr 25, 2014 6:28 AM, "Schwitter, Selina (Oerlikon BZ)" <
selina.schwit...@oerlikon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi !
>
> That means exactly?
>
It means exactly what I wrote. It cannot be scrubbed from the Internet. And
talking about it more (this thread) only increases the chances of someone
finding it.
>
On Apr 25, 2014 5:37 AM, "Schwitter, Selina (Oerlikon BZ)" <
selina.schwit...@oerlikon.com> wrote:
>
> Hi at all,
> Can you please delete my e-mail entrie from the 22. Oct 2013?
>
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201310.mbox/%3c4b7139bd06fd7745b50fe35be30a192fbf356...@ad0
HI Sweta,
What is the tortoise svn version you are using?
Regards,
Sufyan Khan
*Tekyz Inc.* (www.tekyz.com)
*Email:* suf...@tekyz.com
*Skype:* sufyan247
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Sweta Sonegra wrote:
> ---
>
> Subversion Exception!
>
> --
Hi at all,
Can you please delete my e-mail entrie from the 22. Oct 2013?
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/201310.mbox/%3c4b7139bd06fd7745b50fe35be30a192fbf356...@ad02trv100.dom02.net%3E
There's my whole address in this Mail shown on the internet..
Thx a lot.!!
Kind
TortoiseSVN 1.7.3, Build 22386 - 64 Bit , 2011/12/16 15:01:39
Subversion 1.7.2,
From: Sufyan Khan [mailto:suf...@tekyz.com]
Sent: 25 April 2014 12:33
To: Sweta Sonegra
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Sufyan Khan; Suyog Kale
Subject: Re: Getting error while taking update
HI Sweta,
Wha
On 16 April 2014 21:13, Florian Ludwig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this topic was raised several times in the past - the answers range from
> "will be better/solved in the next version 1.7" or "it is due to ntfs vs
> ext3/4" or it's the AV, network setup or the Windows file indexing service.
> After disablin
24 matches
Mail list logo
