Ben Reser writes:
> On 3/17/14, 9:12 PM, Steven Wang wrote:
>> My Subversion server install on Centos, running as svnserve.
>>
>> I have follows repositories created on server :
>> I use “svnadmin create” to create repository,
>> some hard link reference count for db folder is 6
>>
>> (drwxrwsr
On 3/17/14, 9:12 PM, Steven Wang wrote:
> My Subversion server install on Centos, running as svnserve.
>
> I have follows repositories created on server :
> I use “svnadmin create” to create repository,
> some hard link reference count for db folder is 6
>
> (drwxrwsr-x 6 stevenw stevenw 4096 Mar
"Matthews, David" writes:
> I guess we'll need to wait for 1.8.9?
> (we normally use the wandisco RPMs)
> Unfortunately this is causing us a lot of pain.
It's proposed for the next 1.8.x release. The fix for 1.8 is
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=r1578885
if you want to bui
> -Original Message-
> From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 18 March 2014 13:02
> To: Matthews, David
> Cc: 'users@subversion.apache.org'
> Subject: Re: svnserve 1.8 + slow network + large
> svn:mergeinfo property
>
> "Matthews, David" writes:
>
> > Does this
"Matthews, David" writes:
> Does this make sense to anyone?
> Why should the size of the svn:mergeinfo property affect "ls -R" commands?
> I haven't managed to measure the network traffic yet but I assume that, for
> some reason, svnserve is transmitting a lot of unnecessary information?
Yes. 1
We recently upgraded from subversion 1.6 to 1.8.5.
After upgrading we have discovered a major performance issue when accessing
some repositories from a remote site.
After much investigation I've discovered that the problem only becomes
obvious for repositories with large svn:mergeinfo properties.
Hi,
For the following working copy structure:
- working_copy_root_dir
-- externalFileNORMAL(node status = normal)
-- externalFileMISSING (node status = missing)
-- externalFileOBSTRUCTED(node status = obstructed)
if I run:
cd working_copy_root_dir
svn status -u .
On 17.03.2014 17:29, Pete wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov visualsvn.com> writes:
>
>> On 10 March 2014 18:25, Gareth McCaughan
>> lightblueoptics.com> wrote:
>>> It appears that files checked out using Subversion (1.7 onwards)
>>> are marked as not indexable by Windows search. The way in which
>>> this happ
