On 2/7/14, 10:45 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Finally, save yourself some trouble and learn the ^/ syntax:
> https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.5.html#externals-relative-urls
And it's clearly too late since I linked to the wrong relative URL release
note. I meant:
https://subversion.apa
On 2/7/14, 4:28 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> % svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible -r202859 ${Repository Root}/trunk
> r200832
> r200833
> r200836
> r200837
> [ ... snip ...]
>
> Notice that -r200832 is much earlier than the r202859 argument which was
> passed on the command line.
>
> My wild guess is
On 2/7/14, 1:28 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> We switched from svn:// to http:// and didn't see any pref difference. Then
> again, I didn't benchmark it. That said, we don't do any path based
> authorization and that may be the difference.
svnserve will be faster if you're committing a lot of files.
Hi Bob,
I'm dumping then loading, the reason is I'm moving from one PC to another.
I could load over the network, but the dump file is nearly 40GB.
Cheers,
Ian
On Saturday, February 8, 2014 3:37:58 AM UTC+13, Bob Archer wrote:
>
> Are you streaming to disk, then loading from disk? You might w
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014, at 04:18 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> And if I replace the "…branches/4.0.2" with "…trunk", I can see all the
> revisions that haven't been merged from trunk yet.
Hmm, I spoke too soon:
% svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible -r202859 ${Repository Root}/trunk
r200832
r200833
r200836
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014, at 03:37 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
> The help says:
>
> (some commands also take ARG1:ARG2 range)
>
> Did you not get what you wanted without specifying a range?
Hmm, that looks promising:
% svn mergeinfo --show-revs=eligible -r202859 ${Repository
Root}/branches/4.0.2
r202880
r
> I created a branch (4.0.x) from trunk. Work progressed on trunk and was
> selectively merged down to the 4.0.x branch.
>
> The intent was to do our next release off this branch and then kill it.
> Subsequent releases would come from the trunk (or branches thereof).
>
> Unfortunately plans chang
I created a branch (4.0.x) from trunk. Work progressed on trunk and was
selectively merged down to the 4.0.x branch.
The intent was to do our next release off this branch and then kill it.
Subsequent releases would come from the trunk (or branches thereof).
Unfortunately plans changed, and we nee
We switched from svn:// to http:// and didn't see any pref difference. Then
again, I didn't benchmark it. That said, we don't do any path based
authorization and that may be the difference.
I prefer edge mostly for the inclusion of the management console, the WebView,
and the push button updat
I'm the first to admit I'm no expert... so I would not be surprised or
offended to find I was asking for something really stupic.
My logic for supporting both protocols is, my understanding is that SVN
protocol can be substantially faster and I was planning to use this both as
the preferred protoc
> I've been using Apache to proide HTTP access to several different SVN
> repository directories on a single server for about 10 years.
> I'm moving everything to a new server and I was considering using SVNSERVE
> in place of or in addition to Apache for access to the repositories.
Sure... but I
Thanks, it's sssooo obvious now!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:04 PM
To: Tom Malia; users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Multiple SVN repos with single server?
On 2/7/14, 11:57 AM, Tom Malia wrote:
> Is it possible to s
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tom Malia wrote:
> I've been using Apache to proide HTTP access to several different SVN
> repository directories on a single server for about 10 years.
>
> I'm moving everything to a new server and I was considering using SVNSERVE
> in place of or in addition to Ap
On 2/7/14, 11:57 AM, Tom Malia wrote:
> Is it possible to server multiple SVN repositories…. Where I mean completely
> different SVN directories… not separate folders within a single SVN repo…
> using
> SVNSERVE on a single server? If so, how?
svnserve -d -r /var/svn
Where each folder in /var/s
I've been using Apache to proide HTTP access to several different SVN
repository directories on a single server for about 10 years.
I'm moving everything to a new server and I was considering using SVNSERVE
in place of or in addition to Apache for access to the repositories.
Is it possible to
> I'm trying to upgrade a very old svn repo but the command is failing.
>
> % svn upgrade .
> svn: /build/buildd/subversion-
> 1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c:1518: uri_skip_ancestor: Assertion
> `svn_uri_is_canonical(parent_uri, ((void *)0))' failed.
> [1] 3298 abort svn upgrade
dclist writes:
> I'm trying to upgrade a very old svn repo but the command is failing.
"working copy" rather than "repo".
>
> % svn upgrade .
> svn:
> /build/buildd/subversion-1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c:1518:
> uri_skip_ancestor: Assertion `svn_uri_is_canonical(parent_uri, ((void
I'm trying to upgrade a very old svn repo but the command is failing.
% svn upgrade .
svn:
/build/buildd/subversion-1.7.5/subversion/libsvn_subr/dirent_uri.c:1518:
uri_skip_ancestor: Assertion `svn_uri_is_canonical(parent_uri, ((void
*)0))' failed.
[1]3298 abort svn upgrade .
Can anyone
On 2/7/14, 8:27 AM, Shane Anderson wrote:
> So, I ask: Why can't the svn update figure this out? The redirect has the
> root
> URL in it, with '/trunk' added, and knows the working copies old root URL, so
> couldn't it just remove the '/trunk' from the redirected/new URL and still do
> the reloca
I apologize if this has been reported before, or if it's in the wrong
place, but I was wondering if this issue is considered a bug:
I've recent moved a bunch of SVN repositories from one server to
another, with some additional URL path changes. I've set up permanent
redirects from the old to
Thank you for that information ;-)
Kind regards, Axel
Are you streaming to disk, then loading from disk? You might want to just
directly pump the dump stream into the load. Just an idea.
From: Ian Wiles [mailto:ian.alexander.wi...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 3:04 AM
To: subversion_us...@googlegroups.com
Cc: Ian Wiles; users@subve
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> do you know of a way to set a "tunnel user" using apache2 dav svn similar
> to --tunnel-user when accessing via ssh?
>
> That is using one common user to write on the file system but having
> another username appear in the svn
Hello!
Do you know of a way to set a "tunnel user" using apache2 dav svn similar
to --tunnel-user when accessing via ssh?
That is using one common user to write on the file system but having
another username appear in the svn logs?
I want the username authenticated via apache2 using pwauth to ap
Hello,
do you know of a way to set a "tunnel user" using apache2 dav svn similar
to --tunnel-user when accessing via ssh?
That is using one common user to write on the file system but having
another username appear in the svn logs?
I want the username authenticated via apache2 using pwauth to ap
Hello All,
I ran into an subversion exception, while updating my working copy.
I was in the process of re-arranging the project structure, while a
colleague was developing new features.
So I had moved (svn move) a lot of directories and files.
I am running Windows 7, 64bit with TortoiseSVN 1.8.4
Lorenz Wrote:
>
>Roberto Bartola wrote:
>
>>Hi all,
>>I'm trying to use svn as a PDM for CAD files.
>>
>>( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_data_management )
>>
>>It looks working fine but I'd like to do better.
>>
>>-1 structure
>>In my CAD I can create an assembly which is a file where I as
Hi Markus,
Thanks. I ran verify and everything passed. which is good, so I assume it's
recoverable somehow. I'm going to try a fresh dump and see if that helps.
For now I've loaded the last few revisions which is enough for me to be
getting on with until I figure out how to stop svndumpfilter i
28 matches
Mail list logo
