> On Jan 3, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
>> On 1/3/14, 8:59 AM, James Hanley wrote:
>> Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences would
>> be
>> an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is either the result
>> of
>> direct modification or a m
On 1/2/2014 5:25 PM, Mike Fochtman wrote:
Currently the team hasn't used any form of version control on these
applications because 'it would be too hard...'
I think you can get 99% of the way there by making sure that application
'A' is under full version control. Some version control is bette
Thanks for the idea of checking for incompatibility.
ZK
On Jan 3, 2014, at 3:31 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 03.01.2014 21:15, Listman wrote:
>> I am installing apache 2.4.3 and subversion 1.8.5 and I keep getting this
>> error when starting apache:
>>
>> Unknown DAV provider: svn
>>
>>
On 03.01.2014 21:15, Listman wrote:
> I am installing apache 2.4.3 and subversion 1.8.5 and I keep getting this
> error when starting apache:
>
> Unknown DAV provider: svn
>
> I researched the internet and reread the INSTALL instructions in subversion
> and I can’t get it to work.
>
> Here is m
I am installing apache 2.4.3 and subversion 1.8.5 and I keep getting this error
when starting apache:
Unknown DAV provider: svn
I researched the internet and reread the INSTALL instructions in subversion and
I can’t get it to work.
Here is my apache config:
DAV svn <— this line causes t
On 1/3/14, 8:59 AM, James Hanley wrote:
> Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences would be
> an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is either the result
> of
> direct modification or a merge - if the former, that would be the rev
> expanding
> the ke
On 03.01.2014 17:59, James Hanley wrote:
> Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences
> would be an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is
> either the result of direct modification or a merge
There is no guarantee that committed changes are the result o
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 1/2/14, 7:16 PM, James Hanley wrote:
> > I've used the Rev keyword in some of our code, and we noticed that there
> may be
> > a use case gap for the Rev/Revision and possibly Id keyword.
> >
> > As expected the keyword gets updated with any
> I'm part of a small development team (currently 4). We have two
> applications used in-house that consist of about 1900 source files. The two
> applications share about 1880 of the files in common, and there are only
> about 20 different between them.
>
> For a lot of complicated reasons I won'
