On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:19, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to
use a subversion working copy.
>>
>> That's hardly a problem these days,
>
> You apparently don’t try to w
Hi All
We have a few revision numbers on trunk that we like to block but they are
not in consecutive order - i.e. rev numbers 1,5,8,10,11
We like to merge from trunk to a branch but would like to block them on the
branch.
What's the correct syntax for svn merge --record-only ?
Is it
svn merge -
On 12/11/13 7:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I guess I don't understand why it couldn't be as simple as having the
> library get a pristine copy on demand if some operation needs it.
The original wc code had almost no abstraction around the pristines (as far as
I can recall, it's been a long time si
On Dec 11, 2013, at 19:19, Les Mikesell wrote:
Also, it would mean you would need a constant connection to the server to
>>> use a subversion working copy.
>
> That's hardly a problem these days,
You apparently don’t try to work at the kinds of coffee shops I go to, where 50
college stude
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>
> Absolutely, the answer here isn't a one size fits all. Nobody is objecting to
> the idea of allowing this. The problem is that the code is not designed to
> allow this and it's a ton of work to change that. I can think of a good 10
> other t
On 12/11/13 5:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Not exactly. Network traffic is generally bursty. Clients rarely
> spend 100% of their time checking out files, so a very large number
> could share a local network even if they always deleted their
> workspaces and checked out fresh copies. But when st
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Bob Archer wrote:
>>> > Wouldn't that mean that you need to have some daemon service (or file
>> watcher or something) running to determine if a file is modified?
>>
>> Yes.
Why would you need that in real-time instead of only when an svn
operation is done (possi
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 12/11/13 9:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Within reasonable limits it doesn't cost anything more to send more
>> network traffic. But the cost of client disks scales up by the
>> number of clients. Sometimes you can get by mounting a netwo
On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these enviro
> On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote:
> >> On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
> >>> I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Here’s an idea.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
> >>> the p
On 11.12.2013 20:19, Bob Archer wrote:
>> On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
>>> I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here’s an idea.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
>>> the pristine directory only w
> On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
> >
> > I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here’s an idea.
> >
> >
> >
> > Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
> > the pristine directory only when a file is changed?
> >
>
> You
On 11.12.2013 17:21, Mark Kneisler wrote:
>
> I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
>
>
>
> Here’s an idea.
>
>
>
> Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to
> the pristine directory only when a file is changed?
>
You know, that's a great idea!
On 12/11/13 9:47 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Within reasonable limits it doesn't cost anything more to send more
> network traffic. But the cost of client disks scales up by the
> number of clients. Sometimes you can get by mounting a network disk
> into all the clients, but then performance suff
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Bob Archer wrote:
>> Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
>> management into test and production environments.
>>
>> For these environments I have a few requirements:
>> Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
>>
> Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
> management into test and production environments.
>
> For these environments I have a few requirements:
> Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
> For new releases I will need to perform an update to
On 12/11/13 7:46 AM, Mark Kneisler wrote:
> Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
> management into test and production environments.
>
> For these environments I have a few requirements:
> Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
> For new
I think making the pristine files optional would work for me.
Here's an idea.
Instead of having pristine copies of all files, how about adding to the
pristine directory only when a file is changed?
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 9:58 AM
To: Ma
Mark Kneisler writes:
> Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
> management into test and production environments.
>
> For these environments I have a few requirements:
> Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
> For new releases I will ne
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Mark Kneisler <
mark.kneis...@tceq.texas.gov> wrote:
> Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
> management into test and production environments.
>
> For these environments I have a few requirements:
> Files in these envir
Yes, I understand the export function. I want functionality for release
management into test and production environments.
For these environments I have a few requirements:
Files in these environments will NEVER be edited
For new releases I will need to perform an update to revi
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 8/20/13 3:15 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > But from what I see process is stuck in
> > libaprutil-1.dll!7489fc50(), given the last message in debug
> > log is "auth_ldap authenticate: using URL" it most likely problem with
> > communica
22 matches
Mail list logo
