Re: subversion hardcoded to look for libserf-1.so.1 when a newer libserf is available

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
"bzb.dev001" writes: > Since there is not problem with the permissions. That means that > subversion is looking elsewhere for libserf-1.so.1 The serf dependency is part of libsvn_ra_serf, you can see it using $ objdump -x libsvn_ra_serf-1.so | grep NEEDED.*serf NEEDED libserf-1

Re: subversion hardcoded to look for libserf-1.so.1 when a newer libserf is available

2013-12-05 Thread bzb.dev001
On 13-12-05 04:06 PM, Philip Martin wrote: "bzb.dev001" writes: o) compile serf-1.3.2 $ scons APR=/usr/local/bin/apache-apr-1.5.0 APU=/usr/local/bin/apache-apr-util-1.5.3 $ sudo scons install Details of the output are here: http://pastebin.ca/2492961 The resulting serf headers and librarie

Re: subversion hardcoded to look for libserf-1.so.1 when a newer libserf is available

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
"bzb.dev001" writes: > o) compile serf-1.3.2 > > $ scons APR=/usr/local/bin/apache-apr-1.5.0 > APU=/usr/local/bin/apache-apr-util-1.5.3 > $ sudo scons install > > Details of the output are here: http://pastebin.ca/2492961 > > The resulting serf headers and libraries are installed here: > > /usr/

Re: Unable to open repository following reboot

2013-12-05 Thread Pat Haley
Hi Les, Well that reboot was more of an adventure than I had anticipated. And in all the "adventure" we ended up rolling back to the configuration without quotas, but svn is working now. Thanks for all of your time and help. Pat Hi Les, On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Pat Haley wrote:

subversion hardcoded to look for libserf-1.so.1 when a newer libserf is available

2013-12-05 Thread bzb.dev001
I'm compiling subversion-1.8.5 from source with the following supporting projects. The system is a linux box running Lubuntu 12.04 64bit. subversion-1.8.5 serf-1.3.2 apache-apr-1.5.0 apache-apr-util-1.5.3 After compiling from source, when run 'svn', the following error occurs. $ /usr/local/b

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
Adam Daughterson writes: > On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson >> wrote: >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows >>>

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread David Kelly
On Dec 5, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson >> wrote: >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Adam Daughterson, am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2013 um 18:07 schrieben Sie: > Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not > Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a > Windows share to not work. [...] > fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|075

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > >>> Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not >>> Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a >>> Windows >>> share to not work. >> >> This is starting to sound like one of those "if i

Re: svn merge output: "R"

2013-12-05 Thread C M
Ben, I should have checked "svn help" before posting...thank you for the response. On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > On 12/5/13 9:29 AM, C M wrote: > > Hello. > > > > I ran "svn merge --reintegrate --dry-run" against branch. As part of the > > dry-run preview, several files a

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Adam Daughterson
On 12/05/2013 10:25 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows share to not work. This is starting to soun

Re: svn merge output: "R"

2013-12-05 Thread Ben Reser
On 12/5/13 9:29 AM, C M wrote: > Hello. > > I ran "svn merge --reintegrate --dry-run" against branch. As part of the > dry-run preview, several files are marked with: > > Rpath-to-file\src\Update.c > > What does the "R" mean? I haven't encountered it before. Can someone please > explain? > T

svn merge output: "R"

2013-12-05 Thread C M
Hello. I ran "svn merge --reintegrate --dry-run" against branch. As part of the dry-run preview, several files are marked with: Rpath-to-file\src\Update.c What does the "R" mean? I haven't encountered it before. Can someone please explain? Thank you.

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Adam Daughterson wrote: > > Checkouts on the local disk do work, and checkouts to Samba shares (not > Windows) work as well. I've only found operations on WC living on a Windows > share to not work. This is starting to sound like one of those "if it hurts, don't

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Adam Daughterson
On 12/05/2013 09:47 AM, Philip Martin wrote: Adam Daughterson writes: mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn", 0777) = 0 mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/pristine", 0777) = 0 mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/tmp", 0777) = 0 open("/mnt/cns/Users/ad

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
Adam Daughterson writes: > mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn", 0777) = 0 > mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/pristine", 0777) = 0 > mkdir("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/tmp", 0777) = 0 > open("/mnt/cns/Users/adaughterson/tmp/Tools/.svn/wc.db", > O_RDW

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Dave Huang
On 2013-12-05 1:16 AM, David Kelly wrote: Repeat adding -s to ls. I think that will list the position of EOF. I think you have a sparse file which physically occupies 119k but has massive holes which have yet to be assigned disk blocks. It's the other way around-- ls -l shows the logical lengt

Re: Unable to open repository following reboot

2013-12-05 Thread Pat Haley
Hi Les, On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Pat Haley wrote: One thing that didn't stand out in my original Email was the reason for the reboot. We turned quotas on. Would svn react poorly to this? Only on a write that exceeds quota. It is a generic linux box. However doing dmesg before a

Re: Issue - SVN cannot create SASL context

2013-12-05 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 03:02:10PM -0800, John wrote: > After many hours of apparently pointless googling, I hope to get an answer > here. > > I asked a question on unix.stackexchange.com which essentially outlines my > problem: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/103714/svn-failing-to-crea

Re: SQLite appears to be compiled without large file support

2013-12-05 Thread Philip Martin
Adam Daughterson writes: > Prior to upgrading to WanDisco's 1.7.14 client, I was able to operate on > working copies which physically live on Windows shares. After the upgrade, I > get the following error when trying to do a fresh checkout: > > me@here:tmp$ svn co http://myThing/trunk myThing

RE: Why does `svnversion -c` give me a range?

2013-12-05 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com] > Sent: 05 December 2013 09:29 > > On Dec 5, 2013, at 03:23, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > >> Note that "bare" svnversion can give a range as well: > >> > >>% svnversion -c ~srv/conf > >>105:143 > >>

Re: Why does `svnversion -c` give me a range?

2013-12-05 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Dec 5, 2013, at 03:23, Cooke, Mark wrote: >> Note that "bare" svnversion can give a range as well: >> >>% svnversion -c ~srv/conf >>105:143 >>% svnversion ~srv/conf >>142:143 > > Understood, however for my example I get a different "sort" of answer > with(out) `-c` on all my

RE: Why does `svnversion -c` give me a range?

2013-12-05 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: 04 December 2013 16:08 > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:14:33 -0600: > > > > On Dec 4, 2013, at 06:00, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > > > > I would like to include the svn revision number in my

RE: Why does `svnversion -c` give me a range?

2013-12-05 Thread Cooke, Mark
Hi Bob, > -Original Message- > From: Bob Archer [mailto:bob.arc...@amsi.com] > Sent: 04 December 2013 15:22 > > > Hi Folks, > > > > I would like to include the svn revision number in my > > project's version info but I am confused by the results > > of svnversion. I want the version n

Re: Unable to open repository following reboot

2013-12-05 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Pat Haley, am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2013 um 02:20 schrieben Sie: > % file /home/phaley/Papers/2011/ArpitVel/SvnPaper/db/rep-cache.db > /home/phaley/Papers/2011/ArpitVel/SvnPaper/db/rep-cache.db: SQLite 3.x > database, user version 1 [...] > lstat(".svn/log", 0x7fff48dcbec0) = -1