On 10/18/13 12:46 PM, Naumenko, Roman wrote:
> But there are still checks (or maybe this is just info log) against
> access-file for each path in repository.
> Is it something expected or enabled somewhere by default?
>
> [Fri Oct 18 15:35:52 2013] [info] [client 10.11.11.18] Access granted:
> '
On 2013/10/18 1:51 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On 10/18/13 10:01 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote:
>> What I noticed is that svn server making a request for each svn URI or
>> operation, which neither LDAP server likes nor users that could be
>> waiting for their turn to be authenticated and see delays in svn
On 10/18/13 10:01 AM, Naumenko, Roman wrote:
> What I noticed is that svn server making a request for each svn URI or
> operation, which neither LDAP server likes nor users that could be
> waiting for their turn to be authenticated and see delays in svn server
> response.
>
> Could somebody poi
Hi,
There is a simple setup for svn users authentication on the server using
LDAP.
DAV svn
SVNListParentPath on
SVNParentPath /path_to_data
SVNListParentPath on
AuthzSVNAccessFile /path_to_accessfile/accfile
AuthzLDAPAuthoritative off
W dniu 2013-10-18 16:22, Ivan Zhakov pisze:
On 18 October 2013 18:06, Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
I'm asked about:
" OK. So please tell me whether this fix (r152289) for issue
#4425 is already merged to branch 1.8.x?!("
Ivan's answer is not enough for me. Ivan wrote:
"Well, I checked logs more
On 18 October 2013 18:06, Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
>
> I'm asked about:
>
> " OK. So please tell me whether this fix (r152289) for issue
>> #4425 is already merged to branch 1.8.x?!("
>
> Ivan's answer is not enough for me. Ivan wrote:
>
> "Well, I checked logs more carefully and it seems like issu
Ivan answered that question in this thread two weeks ago.
And it really is not polite to shout at people. Do go easy on the
exclamation marks.
-- Brane
Hello Brane,
And If you don't know what I'm asking please don't write.
I'm asked about:
/"//OK. So please tell me whether this fix (r152289
On 18.10.2013 11:33, Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
>
> "Fully supported" does not mean that anyone gets to dictate when we make
> a release. It means that we will fix bugs, and this bug has been fixed
> and will be in the next release. If you can't wait, you can always build
> your own binaries, or ask (
"Fully supported" does not mean that anyone gets to dictate when we make
a release. It means that we will fix bugs, and this bug has been fixed
and will be in the next release. If you can't wait, you can always build
your own binaries, or ask (or pay) someone else to do it. The sources
are free;
