From: Mark Phippard
Sent: Saturday, 24 August 2013 6:35 AM
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Maureen Barger wrote:
I am currently planning an upgrade from SVN 1.5 (using svnserve and
ssh tunnel) to SVN 1.8.1 fronted with Apache and webdav using AD for
authNz.
We ha
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:46:11AM +0200, Stefan Sperling claimed:
>Looking at just one use case is not going to help us in the long term.
>And I don't think we should hard-code conflict resolution behaviour in
>the update/switch/merge logic.
>
>During 1.8 development, I did experiment with hard-co
I am building Subversion 1.8.1 on Solaris. The dependent libraries
(APR, APR-util, Serf) are built, specified, and ready to go, and yet
this happens:
configure: serf library configuration via prefix
checking serf.h usability... yes
checking serf.h presence... yes
checking for serf.h... yes
checkin
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:30:02AM +0300, Sergiy Tkachuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using TortoiseSVN 1.8.1, Build 24570 - 32 Bit , 2013/07/22
> 18:28:29, Subversion 1.8.1, -release, apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2,
> serf 1.3.0, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013, zlib 1.2.8
>
> I created batch file and want to
Hello,
I am using TortoiseSVN 1.8.1, Build 24570 - 32 Bit , 2013/07/22
18:28:29, Subversion 1.8.1, -release, apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2, serf
1.3.0, OpenSSL 1.0.1e 11 Feb 2013, zlib 1.2.8
I created batch file and want to call it from Jenkins CI.
The command line follows:
svn update --trust-se
On 25.08.2013 15:03, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> 'svn mergeinfo' walks the tree upwards. As to listing branches by
> walking the tree downwards, if you consider 'svn pg -R svn:branch
> ^/branches', and let N = number of branches and M = number of files per
> branch, it would do O(NM) work to compute an
'svn mergeinfo' walks the tree upwards. As to listing branches by
walking the tree downwards, if you consider 'svn pg -R svn:branch
^/branches', and let N = number of branches and M = number of files per
branch, it would do O(NM) work to compute an O(N)-sized answer.
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, A
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 02:57:50PM -0700, Travis Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Stefan Sperling claimed:
> >On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:26:41PM -0700, Travis Brown wrote:
> >> That's just overcomplicating the issue. This doesn't even need to
> >> become a tree conflict.
> >
