Re: Problem with SSL Client auth and libserf

2013-07-25 Thread Lieven Govaerts
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Bernd May >> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am experiencing re-negotiation issues namely connection closed when >>> trying to

Re: Problem with SSL Client auth and libserf

2013-07-25 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi Bernd, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Lieven Govaerts wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Bernd May > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am experiencing re-negotiation issues namely connection closed when >> trying to use a subversion client >=1.8 against an svn server running >> >> Deb

RE: Mixing recursive and non-recursive commits

2013-07-25 Thread Braun, Eric
I think if the documentation for --parents says it will do a non-recursive commit of any intermediate directories and if any of these are marked as replaced or copied it will error out then this is sufficient documentation for the user. Yes, the scenarios you listed are correct but with the rig

Re: Problem with SSL Client auth and libserf

2013-07-25 Thread Lieven Govaerts
Hi, On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Bernd May wrote: > Hello, > > I am experiencing re-negotiation issues namely connection closed when > trying to use a subversion client >=1.8 against an svn server running > > Debian Wheezy > apache 2.2.22 > libapache 1.8.1 > subversion 1.8.1 > openssl 1.0.1e

Re: Mixing recursive and non-recursive commits

2013-07-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:01:23PM +, Braun, Eric wrote: > I don't know why this is > should be complicated to do from the command line when GUI clients are > already doing this today. My concern is not about whether this would be complicated to implement. It wouldn't be. My concern is that y

Problem with SSL Client auth and libserf

2013-07-25 Thread Bernd May
Hello, I am experiencing re-negotiation issues namely connection closed when trying to use a subversion client >=1.8 against an svn server running Debian Wheezy apache 2.2.22 libapache 1.8.1 subversion 1.8.1 openssl 1.0.1e with ssl client auth. I have now spent about 4 hours of searching throug

RE: Mixing recursive and non-recursive commits

2013-07-25 Thread Braun, Eric
I understand the copy and delete scenarios. They would have to be identified up front (with perhaps a behind the scenes svn status -u --depth=empty on all the parent directories w/ respect to the command line objects) and if they are replaced or added via copy then it would error out and make t

Re: Backup strategy sanity check

2013-07-25 Thread Andy Levy
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:28PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Andy Levy wrote: >> > I'm planning my upgrade to SVN 1.8 & to go along with it, setting up a >> > new backup process. Here's what I'm th

RE: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: donderdag 25 juli 2013 13:24 > To: Ivan Zhakov > Cc: Subversion Development; users@subversion.apache.org; Thorsten > Schöning > Subject: Re: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 > anymore > > O

Subversion 1.7.11 and 1.8.1 SRPM bulding tools updated on github

2013-07-25 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Good morning: I see that 1.7.11 and 1.8.1 were just released, and I was up doing a software deployment with folks in India last night. So for anyone working in RHEL or CentOS or Scientific Linux worls, I've been publishing tools to build those as RPM's over at github.com, and I've just updated the

Re: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Stefan Sperling, am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 13:23 schrieben Sie: > I would say it's a new feature, not a bug fix. Which would mean that > it needs to wait for 1.9. But things worked in Subversion 1.7.x. It's not about versioned links or things like that, not even anything unversion

Re: Backup strategy sanity check

2013-07-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:22:11PM -0400, Thomas Harold wrote: > What we might do once 1.8 server is stable is switch to doing the > new "incremental" style hotcopy on Mon-Sat evenings and do a full > hotcopy on Sun. In Subversion 1.8, a full hotcopy is implemented as an incremental hotcopy into a

Re: Backup strategy sanity check

2013-07-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:08:28PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Andy Levy wrote: > > I'm planning my upgrade to SVN 1.8 & to go along with it, setting up a > > new backup process. Here's what I'm thinking: > > > > * Monday overnight, take a full backup (svnadm

Re: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 02:04:30PM +0400, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > Reading symbolic links on Windows Vista and later is implemented on > trunk in r1501251 [1]: > [[[ > Implement reading symbolic links on Windows Vista or later. This fix > issues with working copies located in symlinked folders. > ]]] >

Re: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ivan Zhakov, am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 12:04 schrieben Sie: > Reading symbolic links on Windows Vista and later is implemented on > trunk in r1501251 [1]: I hope this will work with junctions, too, as from my understanding both are technically different, but even MSDN often just r

Re: Backup strategy sanity check

2013-07-25 Thread Thomas Harold
On 7/24/2013 4:21 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: Is that better than using svnsync from a remote server plus some normal file backup approach for the conf/hooks directories? Not sure, I have not tried out svnsync. We also don't use post-commit hooks (yet). I am under the impression that hotcopy do

Re: Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working heavily with Windows junctions in my development > environment, meaning that e.g. I check out a working copy in an > Eclipse workspace using Subclipse and afterwards create a junction to > my httpd cgi-bin directory

Windows junctions are not supported in Subversion 1.8.0 anymore

2013-07-25 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Hello, I'm working heavily with Windows junctions in my development environment, meaning that e.g. I check out a working copy in an Eclipse workspace using Subclipse and afterwards create a junction to my httpd cgi-bin directory. Please note that I do not link deeply into the working copy but crea