Re: History in subversion

2013-06-14 Thread Andreas Krey
On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:55:11 +, Andrew Reedick wrote: ... > Back in my day, CC snapshot views were terrible/horrible/nearly_unusable. > SVN workspaces are simply great. I doubt your users will complain once they > start using them. There is one thing that potentially can cause a *lot* of p

RE: History in subversion

2013-06-14 Thread Andrew Reedick
> From: Olivier Antoine [mailto:oliviera201...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 3:57 PM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: History in subversion > > > Thanks All again for your help, >  >  > > If you're just trying to find a file in the current version of the repo, > > t

Re: Bug in SVN

2013-06-14 Thread Nikitha Annaji
Hi Johan, Thanks for replying. Yes, you are right. I tried using that command in couple of ways. And i got to know the concept of this. Thank you. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Michael Pruemm > wrote: > > Nikitha Annaji vayavyal

Re: Bug in SVN

2013-06-14 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Michael Pruemm wrote: > Nikitha Annaji vayavyalabs.com> writes: > >> I was trying to display the log message between the dates 2013-06-13 and > 2013-06-14 by the following command "svn log -r {2013-06-14}:{2013-06-13}", > if no one has committed from the mentione

Re: Bug in SVN

2013-06-14 Thread Michael Pruemm
Nikitha Annaji vayavyalabs.com> writes: > I was trying to display the log message between the dates 2013-06-13 and 2013-06-14 by the following command "svn log -r {2013-06-14}:{2013-06-13}", if no one has committed from the mentioned date then the log should be empty but it is showing the last co

Bug in SVN

2013-06-14 Thread Nikitha Annaji
Hi, I was trying to display the log message between the dates 2013-06-13 and 2013-06-14 by the following command "svn log -r {2013-06-14}:{2013-06-13}", if no one has committed from the mentioned date then the log should be empty but it is showing the last commit which is was committed on 2013-06-

Re: History in subversion

2013-06-14 Thread Andreas Krey
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 21:57:17 +, Olivier Antoine wrote: ... > I think that dynamic view is still a nice concept. Dynamic views is > something that users like much, and they desespair when they have to > migrate to snapshot views. > You create your view, you have an (almost) real-time connection

Re: History in subversion

2013-06-14 Thread Andreas Krey
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 16:23:39 +, Les Mikesell wrote: ... > > Revision numbers can be renumbered one day in the repository, so they cannot > > be used in the SCM process, am I wrong ? > > No, revisions can never be renumbered in an existing repository. It > is possible to dump the repository a