On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Samantha Tilney wrote on Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:12:09 -0400:
>> I figured you Subversion fiends might have some experience with Git ;)
>
> So? This is a mailing list for Subversion user support. It has 800+
> readers, most of whom are not
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Dennis Estenson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I am not a subscriber to the list, so I would appreciate being CC'd on any
> replies.
>
>
>
> How would I go about checking for user (write) permissions without actually
> doing a procedure that might fail due to permissions?
Hello,
I am not a subscriber to the list, so I would appreciate being CC'd on any
replies.
How would I go about checking for user (write) permissions without actually
doing a procedure that might fail due to permissions? Say, for example, I
don't have write permissions to a project in SVN. I
> Hello,
> I know this has been asked already, but we would really like to reject any
> attempt to commit files which would break a project in trunk. The decision to
> reject the committed files is based on the result of the building process of
> the
> project the files being committed belong to.
Hello Thomas,
> most users use tortoisesvn. What are the drawbacks of NTLM, SSPI, for
> Tortoisesvn users? I read some articles about 401 errors etc...
What articles do you refer to? Generally speaking, using
NTLM/Negotiate over SSPI is harmless and does not lead to issues with
TortoiseSVN.
> A
Indeed, but I was still hoping someone from the dev community could confirm it
is a compatibility issue, and possibly provide the reasons behind the errors.
In any case, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions.
Sincerely,
Rami
Le 24/05/2013 15:14, Johan Corveleyn a écrit :
On Fri
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM, HOUDROGE Rami
wrote:
> I could provide a script, but I doubt it would be of any use. It will
> execute as it should on your pcs.
>
> I didn't clearly mention that subversion is installed on a Apache 2.2.17
> server with webdav_svn. We think there might be an incomp
Dear Subversion support team,
I want to file a bug report affecting Subversion 1.7.9.
In our software system, we currently use Subversion 1.6 and recognized a
possible performance reduction (~ 15x times) in 1.7 concerning the deletion of
files using JavaHL.
Let's start describing test environ
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, San Martino wrote:
> We already use branches, but we use/justify them for developping long
> features or bug-fixes which require some time and are not urgent.
> In many cases, however, we must urgently fix small, short and important bugs
> and release everything im
On 24.05.2013 12:34, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
> am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 12:16 schrieben Sie:
>
>> I am able to access the repository through internet explorer but not through
>> tortoise svn client.
> Then check the proxy settings of both, they may be different, with
>
I could provide a script, but I doubt it would be of any use. It will execute
as it should on your pcs.
I didn't clearly mention that subversion is installed on a Apache 2.2.17 server
with webdav_svn. We think there might be an incompatibility somewhere (see
http://subversion.1072662.n5.nabble.
San Martino writes:
> I know that
> during the pre-commit phase the repository cannot be accessed concurrently,
That's not right. The pre-commit runs before taking the repository lock
so other access, including other commits, can occur while the pre-commit
is running. And that means that the p
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 12:16 schrieben Sie:
> I am able to access the repository through internet explorer but not through
> tortoise svn client.
Then check the proxy settings of both, they may be different, with
different auth credentials or something like that.
Mit
I am able to access the repository through internet explorer but not through
tortoise svn client.
-Original Message-
From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de]
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 3:31 PM
To: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: SVN Error
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:05:19PM +0200, San Martino wrote:
> We already use branches, but we use/justify them for developping long
> features or bug-fixes which require some time and are not urgent.
> In many cases, however, we must urgently fix small, short and important
> bugs and release every
We already use branches, but we use/justify them for developping long
features or bug-fixes which require some time and are not urgent.
In many cases, however, we must urgently fix small, short and important
bugs and release everything immediatly.. We act on trunk directly for this
and for this rea
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar,
am Freitag, 24. Mai 2013 um 11:30 schrieben Sie:
> “OPTIONS of Https://Hostname:port/svn/repoName : Could not create
> SSL connection through Proxy Server :504 Gateway Timeout”
Did you access work before? There surely is some problem with your
infrastructure, check your net
HI team,
When I am trying to Accessing SVN Server through Tortoise SVN Repo browser, I
faced the following issue.
"OPTIONS of Https://Hostname:port/svn/repoName : Could not create SSL
connection through Proxy Server :504 Gateway Timeout"
Please help me.
Regrads,
Ajay Pawar
Branko Čibej writes:
> On 24.05.2013 09:32, Tobias Bading wrote:
>> So, the update claims to have updated 3449_spurious to r2 and the
>> merge claims to have merged c4 into that file. As it turns out, both
>> claims seem correct. The contents of 3449_spurious look correct.
>> However, "svn status
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:14:04AM +0200, San Martino wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know this has been asked already, but we would really like to reject any
> attempt to commit files which would break a project in trunk. The decision
> to reject the committed files is based on the result of the building
>
Hi Pavel,
most users use tortoisesvn. What are the drawbacks of NTLM, SSPI, for
Tortoisesvn users? I read some articles about 401 errors etc...
Also, I do not have the AD under control and it would not be easy for me to ask
for changes in the AD. Btw. we are using the free version of Visualsvn an
On 24.05.2013 09:32, Tobias Bading wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> thanks for your suggestions. I tried to dig a little deeper... and now
> things are getting even more strange.
>
> First, I tried to delete everything after the "update -r2" from
> no_spurious_conflict so I could make a copy of the wc befor
Hello,
I know this has been asked already, but we would really like to reject any
attempt to commit files which would break a project in trunk. The decision
to reject the committed files is based on the result of the building
process of the project the files being committed belong to. I know that
Hi Philip,
thanks for your suggestions. I tried to dig a little deeper... and now
things are getting even more strange.
First, I tried to delete everything after the "update -r2" from
no_spurious_conflict so I could make a copy of the wc before the merge.
Guess what? Executing the "merge -c4
24 matches
Mail list logo
