Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, May 18, 2013 at 23:38:11 +0200:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > ...
> >> Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
> >> user or an admin in your dail
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sat, May 18, 2013 at 23:38:11 +0200:
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> > The good old "'svn commit file; svn log' doesn't show the commit to
> > file" issue?
>
> Sorry? What issue is that?
>
This one is actually in the FAQ. It's inherent to how
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> ...
>> Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
>> user or an admin in your daily work. Saying that "branches are not
>> first class", or "I don't like
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:16:48 +, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
...
> Please be concrete, and give examples of what really bothers you as a
> user or an admin in your daily work. Saying that "branches are not
> first class", or "I don't like it that Subversion implements
> branches/tags by copying direc
On Sat, 18 May 2013 17:24:33 +, Zé wrote:
...
> Compared to how other SCM systems handle tags, subversion also doesn't
> have tags as a separate concept. Subversion provides a way to pinpoint
> each commit objectively and unambiguously by specifying specific
> revisions.
Not even that. You
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:33:10 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> Guten Tag Zé,
> am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
>
> > The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
> > is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
> > to those revisions, whi
On Sat, 18 May 2013 19:33:10 +, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
...
> That's not an argument at all, because all one does in other SCMs is
> creating branches and tags. What you really should argue is what all
> devs think is common sense about branches and tags
You mean like 'I expect tags to be imm
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 9:33 PM, David Chapman wrote:
> On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
>>
>> On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
>>> development.
>>
>>
>> No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track c
On 5/18/2013 12:01 PM, Zé wrote:
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
contents of a directory and you rely on changes made to that d
On 05/18/2013 07:16 PM, David Chapman wrote:
You are pretty insistent that there is One True Way to use branches in
development.
No, I'm stating that if all a SCM does is track changes made to the
contents of a directory and you rely on changes made to that directory
to emulate branches, the
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 07:33:10PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> ...
> > Let's put it this way: if that was actually a tag then it could also be
> > argued that any file system supports branching/tagging.
>
> You ignore the versioning part of Subversion and that it guarantees
> the state/histo
On 05/18/2013 06:33 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
Guten Tag Zé,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't.
Wh
On 5/18/2013 9:37 AM, Zé wrote:
On 05/15/2013 06:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Reedick
wrote:
Plus, telling people not use to svn's touted directory manipulation
features because of side-effects is a bit self-defeating.
Not if you want it to act like S
Guten Tag Zé,
am Samstag, 18. Mai 2013 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
> The only difference between subversion and other SCM systems
> is that other systems offer support for labeling and adding useful info
> to those revisions, while Subversion doesn't.
Which useful info besides the name, and always pr
On 05/15/2013 06:59 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Andrew Reedick
wrote:
Plus, telling people not use to svn's touted directory manipulation
features because of side-effects is a bit self-defeating.
Not if you want it to act like SCM's that have branches that don'
On 05/15/2013 04:04 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Zé wrote:
What has been said regarding
subversions lack of support for branching was, I think, quite clear.
Well, no. The only thing you've made clear is that you don't like it
or you don't understand how it is su
On 05/13/2013 06:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote:
No, the basic difference is that VCS operating on the whole tree can
only have branches (and thus merge info) on the whole tree either, so
you*can't* go like subversion does and map branches into the tree and
need to have them (and tags) as a separate
17 matches
Mail list logo
