Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 13 May 2013 18:35:35 +, Bob Archer wrote: ... > Been a while since I have really got into the git internals, but I think each > changeset has a SHA1 hash... if a changeset with that hash is already in a > branch merging won't do anything... there will be nothing to merge. > That said

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 13 May 2013 13:29:39 +, Les Mikesell wrote: ... > ...What does git do if > you try to double-merge a change? You can't. > Does it know about the previous > merge by its changeset commit id, look at the contents that are > already present, or just do it twice? It doesn't have a no

RE: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Bob Archer
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: > > ... > >> Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the > >> difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks > >> complete revisions altho

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: > ... >> Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the >> difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks >> complete revisions although sometime

Re: UNS: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 13 May 2013 11:32:13 +, Les Mikesell wrote: ... > Maybe it is just my misconception, but I've always thought of the > difference between svn and git as being that svn conceptually tracks > complete revisions although sometimes it might generate or store > differences for some operations

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> I would like to see more "first class" support for projects and/or >> defining a project root. For example, perhaps there can be an >> svn:projectroot property that must be on a folder and the branch/merge >> command will only work on p

Re: Issue: unicode characters in file names

2013-05-13 Thread Andy Levy
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Адолин Негаш wrote: > Hello > > I have svn files with unicode chars. When I try to view files, I get an > error message: > > 'https://srv01/svn/SQLServer/Main/BackOffice/Security/Procedures/%5BSecurity%5D.%5BPrivileges::Groups::View(Delphi)%5D.sql' > doesn't exis

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 03:21:15PM +, Bob Archer wrote: > I would like to see more "first class" support for projects and/or > defining a project root. For example, perhaps there can be an > svn:projectroot property that must be on a folder and the branch/merge > command will only work on proje

Issue: unicode characters in file names

2013-05-13 Thread Адолин Негаш
Hello I have svn files with unicode chars. When I try to view files, I get an error message: ' https://srv01/svn/SQLServer/Main/BackOffice/Security/Procedures/%5BSecurity%5D.%5BPrivileges::Groups::View(Delphi)%5D.sql' doesn't exist But when I access revision via browser, there is no

RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Bob Archer
> On 05/13/2013 10:04 AM, Bob Archer wrote: > > What I don't understand is why someone argues about how git does > > something is better yet uses svn. Use the tool that works for you, or > > works the way you expect a tool to work. > > Oh, I'm sure if we tried we could all think up plenty of reaso

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Bob Archer wrote: > > What I don't understand is why someone argues about how git does something is > better yet uses svn. Use the tool that works for you, or works the way you > expect a tool to work. Or, learn what to expect from the tool you use... If I fol

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 05/13/2013 10:04 AM, Bob Archer wrote: > What I don't understand is why someone argues about how git does > something is better yet uses svn. Use the tool that works for you, or > works the way you expect a tool to work. Oh, I'm sure if we tried we could all think up plenty of reasons why someo

RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-13 Thread Bob Archer
> On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 10:50:12PM +0100, Zé wrote: > > You're missing the point. The point is that subversion could be even > > better than what it already is if it actually supported branches. > > OK, I would also like Subversion to get better, so we agree here. > > Now, what kinds of improv

Repair corrupt repository

2013-05-13 Thread Brad Waldon
Hi I am looking for expert help in Brisbane, Australia to repair a corrupt repository. Svnadmin verify returns "Decompression of svndiff data failed" at an earlier revision. We use SVN for document management and don't have the expertise and time internally to resolve. Regards Brad Waldon /