RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread
-Steve > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 08:41 > To: Andrew Reedick > Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams > aka Branches as First Class Objec

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Andrew Reedick wrote: > >> Isn't this just a difference in subversion's and your thinking about >> the significance of the path change? Subversion is going to see the >> path change affecting everything below it because of the way it holds >> projects together.

RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:00 AM > To: Andrew Reedick > Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams > aka Branches as First Class Object

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:20:54AM -0500, Andrew Reedick wrote: > It makes me wonder if it would make sense to slap a > higher-level interface on top of svn in order to implement the process > aspects of version control (and otherwise hide/keep the lower level > details/quirks away from users.) Ye

RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 9:57 AM > To: Andrew Reedick > Cc: Branko Čibej; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams > aka Branches as First Class Objects? >

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Andrew Reedick wrote: >> > It's not a huge problem, but in the real world (i.e. a non-contrived example) > I have branches that have been locked and untouched for months that now have > a new HEAD revision. And those branches, which are supposed to be walled off

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Branko Čibej
On 10.05.2013 15:56, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:40:48AM -0400, Andrew Reedick wrote: >> It's not a huge problem, but in the real world (i.e. a non-contrived >> example) I have branches that have been locked and untouched for >> months that now have a new HEAD revision. And

Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:40:48AM -0400, Andrew Reedick wrote: > It's not a huge problem, but in the real world (i.e. a non-contrived > example) I have branches that have been locked and untouched for > months that now have a new HEAD revision. And those branches, which > are supposed to be walle

RE: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams aka Branches as First Class Objects?

2013-05-10 Thread Andrew Reedick
> -Original Message- > From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:35 PM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Subversion Doesn't Have Branches aka Crossing the Streams > aka Branches as First Class Objects? > > > Well, given that you have no

Re: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to PROPFIND

2013-05-10 Thread Katherine Sheehan
You're welcome. Glad I could help. :) Thanks, Katherine — Sent from Mailbox for iPhone On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Mehdi Hayani wrote: > Perfect :d, as you said i've removed .subversion/auth content and re-run > the same command and it worked > Thank you so much for your help ;) > Regards

Re: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to PROPFIND

2013-05-10 Thread Mehdi Hayani
Perfect :d, as you said i've removed .subversion/auth content and re-run the same command and it worked Thank you so much for your help ;) Regards Mehdi