RE: Error while updating

2013-04-23 Thread Ajay Pawar
Hi Thorsten, Thanks for your reply. SVN Admin verify is showing an error called Can't read end of file. Regards, Ajay Pawar -Original Message- From: Thorsten Schöning [mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:11 PM To: users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: Error while updating

2013-04-23 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Ajay Pawar, am Mittwoch, 24. April 2013 um 07:03 schrieben Sie: > Please help ASAP as the SVN user are not able to any work. "You" changed something and now get errors, therefore you are the only one who can resolve your issues, we can only provide some hints. Some of those are to check

RE: Error while updating

2013-04-23 Thread Ajay Pawar
Hi Andy, I am using this URL from last 3 month, there is no point that URL is wrong. Second thing Server is misconfigured is also not true because other projects are accessible as they are earlier. I do agree that we had installed Visual SVN Server 2.5.7 this Sunday not Monday its working fin

RE: SVN error while committing

2013-04-23 Thread Ajay Pawar
Hi Andy, Earlier I was facing following issue Can't parse lock/entries hash file E:\Repositories\OR\db\locks\308\sdfiocvyywt59vxherh and from the mailing list I found a resolution to delete the below file. Once I had done that I came up with a new error that I posted earlier. When I am try

RE: Error while updating

2013-04-23 Thread Ajay Pawar
Hi Geoff, Thanks for your inputs. But I didn't get you what you want to say. Please elaborate it. Regards, Ajay Pawar From: Geoff Hoffman [mailto:ghoff...@cardinalpath.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 8:47 PM To: Ajay Pawar Subject: Re: Error while updating Check it's not a typo in the pat

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Maybe there are other solutions, but there's a limit to how much I'm > willing to think about this particular requirement in my spare time. Ok guys, don't worry about it. I was sort of hoping someone had a semi easy way. Not worth the pai

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 16:52:10 -0500: > > On Apr 23, 2013, at 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500: > >> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain > >> these comments, then you're talking about sever

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 23, 2013, at 15:56, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500: >> 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain >> these comments, then you're talking about several scripts: one that >> the developers must invoke in place of "svn c

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 01:45:49 -0500: > 3. If you want the actual source code in the repository to contain > these comments, then you're talking about several scripts: one that > the developers must invoke in place of "svn commit" to commit their > work, which transforms their

Re: Error while updating

2013-04-23 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Ajay Pawar wrote: > Hi Team, > > ** ** > > While updating I came up with the following error message. > > ** ** > > *ERROR : Could not open the requested SVN file system.* > > ** ** > > ** > Your server is misconfigured or you're using the wrong URL. That

Re: SVN error while committing

2013-04-23 Thread Andy Levy
On Apr 23, 2013 2:51 AM, "Ajay Pawar" wrote: > > > > Hi Team, > > > > I am facing a the below error while commiting. > > > > Please help me ASAP. > > > > Commit failed (details follow) : > > Server sent unexpected return value (423 locked) in response to DELETE request > > For’/svn/OR/!svn/wrk

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Charles Gallo, am Dienstag, 23. April 2013 um 14:22 schrieben Sie: > Blame/annotate does exactly what I want, but the client (mumble > mumble) wants the info in the actual source code file as comments! I > explained that all the info is in blame/SVN, but they actually said > "the auditor

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 8:47 AM, "C. Michael Pilato" wrote: > > Get different (and clueful) auditors? > > -- > C. Michael Pilato > CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development I think it is more the client. I've pointed out their options, so I'm trying to automate a pain

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread C. Michael Pilato
On 04/22/2013 08:55 PM, Charlie Gallo wrote: > > On 4/22/2013 Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> Charles Gallo wrote on Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 16:13:25 -0400: >>> Any ideas on how to do this? Probably some sort of pre commit hook, but... > >> but pre-commit hooks can't modify the in-flight txn without brea

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Charles Gallo
On Apr 23, 2013, at 6:31 AM, "Bert Huijben" wrote: > > To get you the 'svn blame' / 'svn annotate' output your Subversion client > reads all the full versions of the file that existed since the file was > created. The current format is just one of the possible output formats that > we can calcu

Re: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Branko Čibej
On 23.04.2013 08:45, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > If you want to prevent deletions of lines, install a pre-commit hook that > enforces that rule. That would be quite hard to enforce, since it's not obvious just from looking at (e.g., diffing) two files which lines were actually deleted by the user. Diff

RE: Blame/annotate not good enough...

2013-04-23 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com] > Sent: dinsdag 23 april 2013 08:46 > To: Charles Gallo > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Blame/annotate not good enough... > > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 15:13, Charles Gallo wrote: > > > Ok,