Re: start-commit not receiving userid from commits

2013-01-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Jeffrey Marans wrote: > Each repo has it's own passwd file, and the svnserver.conf file only allows > write access to authenticated users. And you're quite sure that that svnserve.conf or the Apache configurations have not been altered lately? > On 01/22/2013 04:

Re: start-commit not receiving userid from commits

2013-01-22 Thread Jeffrey Marans
Each repo has it's own passwd file, and the svnserver.conf file only allows write access to authenticated users. On 01/22/2013 04:58 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, jmarans wrote: I've installed the latest version of subversion on a centOS 6 system and it was wor

Re: start-commit not receiving userid from commits

2013-01-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:40 PM, jmarans wrote: > I've installed the latest version of subversion on a centOS 6 system and it > was working perfectly well. > Today the start-commit script stopped getting the userid from the svnserve > daemon. > I've reinstalled the subversion software with no chan

SVN 1.6: svn merge marks file as being deleted, but it is not deleted

2013-01-22 Thread Derek Wallace
Hi, We are following the re-book description for long lived branches. So we have a trunk and a feature branch. We regularly keep the feature branch upto date with trunk updates by doing svn merges. We then re-integrate the feature branch back to the trunk. We then follow up with a record only m

start-commit not receiving userid from commits

2013-01-22 Thread jmarans
I've installed the latest version of subversion on a centOS 6 system and it was working perfectly well. Today the start-commit script stopped getting the userid from the svnserve daemon. I've reinstalled the subversion software with no change in behaviour. The problem is consistent across all 32

Re: Failure occurred processing one or more externals definitions

2013-01-22 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 22, 2013, at 06:07, dhanushka ranasinghe wrote: > when i ran the "svn up" i get the following error , is there any reason > for that > > Please not that svn server is : subversion 1.7.7 > Working copy version is : subversion 1.7.5 > > > Error > = > svn: E205011: Failure occ

RE: Working copy corrupted by branch deletion

2013-01-22 Thread Maxwell Ballenger
Thanks a lot, Bert! I will keep an eye out for the fix. Max From: Bert Huijben [mailto:b...@qqmail.nl] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2013 3:59 PM To: Maxwell Ballenger; users@subversion.apache.org Cc: d...@subversion.apache.org Subject: RE: Working copy corrupted by branch deletion

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Andy Levy wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: >> >> Guten Tag ana kish, >> am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 um 07:57 schrieben Sie: >> >> > We were thinking about using a Windows VM machine for this. Is >> > it ok to go with VM? >>

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Andy Levy
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag ana kish, > am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 um 07:57 schrieben Sie: > > > We were thinking about using a Windows VM machine for this. Is > > it ok to go with VM? > > In general yes and besides what others think if you already have

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:27:39PM +0530, ana kish wrote: >> Is it ok to go with VM? > > If you go with a VM, I would advise not to put the repositories onto > a virtual disk image, but on an iscsi disk or SAN that is connected > to the VM

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag ana kish, am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013 um 07:57 schrieben Sie: > We were thinking about using a Windows VM machine for this. Is > it ok to go with VM? In general yes and besides what others think if you already have Windows experience and Windows users just use Windows, there's really n

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:27:39PM +0530, ana kish wrote: > Is it ok to go with VM? If you go with a VM, I would advise not to put the repositories onto a virtual disk image, but on an iscsi disk or SAN that is connected to the VM via network. I've seen a bad case of repository corruption where t

Re: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 1:57 AM, ana kish wrote: > Hi All, > I would like to know the hardware requirements for SVN server. > We would be having around 10 developers are going to use server > simultaneously. > the code of the project could be around 150 MB. That's quite modest. > We were thinkin

RE: Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread Cooke, Mark
Hello, > -Original Message- > From: ana kish [mailto:anakish1...@gmail.com] > Sent: 22 January 2013 06:58 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Hardware requirements > > Hi All, > I would like to know the hardware requirements for SVN server. > We would be having around 10 develop

Hardware requirements

2013-01-22 Thread ana kish
Hi All, I would like to know the hardware requirements for SVN server. We would be having around 10 developers are going to use server simultaneously. the code of the project could be around 150 MB. We were thinking about using a Windows VM machine for this. Is it ok to go with VM? Please advise ho