VSS2SVN is about 60% accurate leaves lots of orphaned files ( in my experience
migrating over 200 VSS databases to Subversion)
The process I used was
1) Create the Subversion Repository that will replace the VSS database
2) Create a subversion working copy ( I had a NAS available with lots of
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:31:17AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> [snipped discussion about --include-externals]
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:13:28AM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
> > would it be possible to have such an option on "svn ls" as well? to my
> > surprise it also silently ignores sv
[snipped discussion about --include-externals]
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 01:13:28AM -0700, rupert.thurner wrote:
> would it be possible to have such an option on "svn ls" as well? to my
> surprise it also silently ignores svn:externals, while e.g. svn co or svn
> up does not.
In principle, yes. C
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:03:16AM +0200, Ben Smith-Mannschott wrote:
> * smithma@oberon ~/w/_backlogs/Entwicklung
> svn up --set-depth=exclude _ERLEDIGT _OBSOLET
> D_ERLEDIGT
> D_OBSOLET
> Summary of updates:
> Updated '_ERLEDIGT' to r140394767667765.
> Updated '_OBSOLET' to r1403947
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:07:17 PM UTC+2, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Marcel Hesselbarth wrote:
> > Hi Developers,
> >
> > I'm redirected here from the tortoise mailing list, as they think this
> > feature belongs to the area of the svn library. Perfo
* smithma@oberon ~/w/_backlogs/Entwicklung
svn up --set-depth=exclude _ERLEDIGT _OBSOLET
D_ERLEDIGT
D_OBSOLET
Summary of updates:
Updated '_ERLEDIGT' to r140394767667765.
Updated '_OBSOLET' to r140394767667765.
I suppose this is just Subversion's way of saying that in the distant
fut
