Johan Corveleyn wrote on Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 22:56:52 +0200:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:56 PM, slaventii wrote:
> >>> Huh? How do you arrive at 23 %? According to these numbers, https is
> >>> almost twice as fast here.
> >>>
> >> Sorry
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:56 PM, slaventii wrote:
>>> Huh? How do you arrive at 23 %? According to these numbers, https is
>>> almost twice as fast here.
>>>
>> Sorry for mistake. Should be:
>> up svn:// ~ 0m 19sec
>> up https:// ~ 0m 35 se
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:56 PM, slaventii wrote:
>> Huh? How do you arrive at 23 %? According to these numbers, https is
>> almost twice as fast here.
>>
> Sorry for mistake. Should be:
> up svn:// ~ 0m 19sec
> up https:// ~ 0m 35 sec
> up svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
Okay, got it.
>> That could
> Huh? How do you arrive at 23 %? According to these numbers, https is
> almost twice as fast here.
>
Sorry for mistake. Should be:
up svn:// ~ 0m 19sec
up https:// ~ 0m 35 sec
up svn vs https perf, % ~ > 23%
> That could very well be the reason here why your tests with 1.7 server
> are slower. I
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:04 AM, slaventii wrote:
> My last test results :
> SVN Server:
> Ubuntu 12.04
> svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830) compiled Jul 19 2012, 21:53:29
> SVN Client:
> Windows Server 2003
> svn, version 1.7.5 (r1336830) compiled May 15 2012, 12:29:08
> LAN 100 Mbit/s
>
> co svn:// ~
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Joachim Sauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently reworking backups of multiple SVN repositories. In the
> process I found out that one of those repositories has three broken
> revisions. The problem is that the revision files in the revs
> directory for those 3 revis
Guten Tag Honeylyn O. Fukuoka,
am Mittwoch, 1. August 2012 um 14:25 schrieben Sie:
> I also changed the pre-revprop-change hook script based on the example
> given there and so as the start-commit hook.
pre-revprop-change is enough, start with the easiest setup possible.
> But when I performed t
Hello,
I'm currently reworking backups of multiple SVN repositories. In the
process I found out that one of those repositories has three broken
revisions. The problem is that the revision files in the revs
directory for those 3 revisions are of size 0 (those contain the
actual data of the revision
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:57:57PM +0800, Honeylyn O.
> Fukuoka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> > We are using snserve not Apache...
> > Will this link still work with us?
>
>
Hi,
I tried the one in your link under repository replication and followed what
was instructed there.
I also changed the pre-revprop-change hook script based on the example
given there and so as the start-commit hook.
But when I performed the 'svnsync initialize' command, I got this error:
sv
Hi,
The reason why I am doing the svnsync is to backup our repository to our
new server in our main branch.
Thanks,
Honey
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:57:57PM +0800, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for this.
> > We are
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:57 AM, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this.
> We are using snserve not Apache...
> Will this link still work with us?
Yes (please read the links to the documentation you've been provided).
But not with an HTTP URL for your source repository. If you're usi
Andreas Krey writes:
> So: is it safe to run 'svnadmin dump' on an operational repo, and will it
> dump up to the last revision at the time of its start or its termination?
Yes, it is safe to run on live repository. If the admin doesn't specify
a revision range it will default to 0:HEAD where H
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:57:57PM +0800, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this.
> We are using snserve not Apache...
> Will this link still work with us?
Sure. svnsync is just about repository replication, and has nothing
to do with what server is being used to allow access to the
> From: Honeylyn O. Fukuoka [mailto:honey...@menue.com]
> Sent: 01 August 2012 09:58
> To: Honeylyn O. Fukuoka; David Chapman; vishwajeet singh;
> users@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SVNSYNC Error
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for this.
> We are using snserve not Apache...
> Will this link still w
Hi,
Thanks for this.
We are using snserve not Apache...
Will this link still work with us?
Thanks,
Honey
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:00:25PM +0800, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
> > Thanks so much for this info, Will try this and will let
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:00:25PM +0800, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
> Thanks so much for this info, Will try this and will let you know it it is
> successful...
There are quite a lot of posts in this thread already, and I'm surprised
that nobody seems to have pointed Honeylyn to the relevant sect
Hi everybody,
our sysdamins raised a question whether 'svnadmin dump' is safe to
run on a live repo (served via apache). The man page does not list a
requirement to stop other operations before dumping, but neither does
it go into any detail what happens if new revisions are created while
the dump
unsubscribe
Thanks so much for this info, Will try this and will let you know it it is
successful...
Thanks,
Honey
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 2:36 PM, David Chapman wrote:
> On 7/31/2012 11:16 PM, Honeylyn O. Fukuoka wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The repositories and the destination repositories are all running on
20 matches
Mail list logo
