On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Benjamin Fritz wrote:
[snip]
> Right, but you mentioned I should try with absolute paths. I chose to
> demonstrate it works with absolute paths, and also to demonstrate the
> problem with a transcript rather than just a prose description.
Ok, thanks for going th
Thanks Stefan, will try out the test repo.
Your help is really appreciated :)
Best Regards
Kiren
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:58:24PM +0200, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> > Thanks Stefan,
> >
> > Is there no way out of this. I'm thinking that
Thanks a ton to all. I have it working.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Schmidt [mailto:subversion-20...@ryandesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 4:24 PM
To: Kapur, Rajneesh
Cc: Philip Martin; users@subversion.apache.org; Thorsten Schöning
Subject: Re: unable to login to svn repo
On J
On Jul 26, 2012, at 15:21, Kapur, Rajneesh wrote:
> Hi Philip,
>
> Do you mean I should have authz file as follows:
>
> [groups]
> harry_and_sally = harry,sally
> [repo4:/home/RKapur]
> @harry_and_sally = rw
> * = r
>
> But still I get the same error:
This would allow the users harry and sall
Hi Philip,
Do you mean I should have authz file as follows:
[groups]
harry_and_sally = harry,sally
[repo4:/home/RKapur]
@harry_and_sally = rw
* = r
But still I get the same error:
-start Logs ---
22673 2012-07-25T16:16:08.256530Z 172.20.33.153 - ho
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:58:24PM +0200, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> Thanks Stefan,
>
> Is there no way out of this. I'm thinking that maybe I should take the
> current code out of trunk and create a brand new repository. I don't want
> our past mistakes to haunt us for the rest of the project :/
>
>
Thanks Stefan,
Is there no way out of this. I'm thinking that maybe I should take the
current code out of trunk and create a brand new repository. I don't want
our past mistakes to haunt us for the rest of the project :/
Is there an alternative way to fix this?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:25 PM, S
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:51:36PM +0200, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> Aslo, I am interested in why this V1-1-1-preprod branch causes the
> conflict. Could you maybe have a look at this snippet of the SVN log where
> I suspect things went wrong? I think the copy from v1-1-0 to trunk is the
> issue?
The
Hi Stefan,
Thanks for your explanation, it is starting to make sense now. We
experience lots of merging issues in our environment but I think its due to
lack of understanding on our part!
Aslo, I am interested in why this V1-1-1-preprod branch causes the
conflict. Could you maybe have a look at
Thanks, Nicothat indeed turn out to be one of our problems.
The other was that the repository used a custom pre-commit hook script that was
originally written for the Korn shell, which wasn't installed on the new server.
Thanks again for the help!
-Original Message-
From: Nico Kadel
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:10 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>> It's my understanding that file externals (which are a relatively new
>> feature for Subversion) are implemented very very differently under the hood
>> from directory external
On 26 July 2012 13:04, Rupam Chowdhury wrote:
> Hi Vishwa,
>
> Thank you very much for your help. I have downloaded
> WANdiscoSubversion_1.7.5-1
>
> Now, this is just to make sure about a couple of things before I proceed
> with the apache installtaion --
>
> 1. Will the Apache HTTPD 2.2 be the co
* authz File Problem.*
Hi Friends am new to this forum...
Am using svnserve 1.4 in windows 7. i want to set permission in authz file.
i want to give the rw permission to the subfolder if root folder is read
protected . why bcoz in my repository i have lot of files & folder. so want
t
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:53:16AM +0200, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have an additional question:
>
> It looks like the latest version of both branches have exactly the same. It
> looks like the conflict occured in a revision that has been merged a while
> back in its history ( svn://bcx-svn/
Guten Tag Rupam Chowdhury,
am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012 um 09:34 schrieben Sie:
> Could you please suggest me the correct binary compatible with my server.
Each binary will work, the only interesting thing for you is if it
should be a 32 or 64 Bit binary and what else should be in the
packages yo
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:04:33AM +0200, Kiren Pillay wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to merge my trunk into my feature branch. I'm coming up with a
> lot of expected tree conflicts (shown below).
>
> Is there an quick/shorthand way to diff this to see the differences between
> the copies?
>
>
Hi Vishwa, Thank you very much for your help. I have downloaded WANdiscoSubversion_1.7.5-1 Now, this is just to make sure about a couple of things before I proceed with the apache installtaion -- 1. Will the Apache HTTPD 2.2 be the correct choice of the server to get integrated with the WANdisc
Hi
I picked up a strange one with "local add, incoming add upon merge". I
thought that this message means I've added a copy of this file locally and
my trunk version also added this file to it's tree. (svn 1.6). According to
the svn info, the trunk version doesn't have the file. Is this correct
be
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Cooke, Mark
> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: xumuku [mailto:xum...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 25 July 2012 16:49
> > To: subversion_us...@googlegroups.com
> > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; xum...@gmail.com
>
>Ah, ok, yes, I did say we use https. The server is configured to
redirect all http traffic >to https (using mod_ssl) and authentication then
happens in that encrypted >environment (or am I being naïve here?)
As I wrote we already have Apache with HTTPS. All is good except speed.
>What is very s
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
>
> On Jul 25, 2012, at 17:50, Benjamin Fritz wrote:
>
>> That's interesting that it works like a switch underneath. But it IS
>> very possible to pull in *directory* externals from other
>> repositories
>
> Absolutely.
>
>> which makes me wonde
>No (sorry), we use https via apache and mod_ldap to authenticate against
AD. I am >interested to know why you think that is not secure enough
(perhaps you have *nix >clients storing plain text passwords?)
Because it works only with PLAIN auth:
tcpdump -ni eth0 -A src host 192.168.1.2 and tcp ds
Hi
I have an additional question:
It looks like the latest version of both branches have exactly the same. It
looks like the conflict occured in a revision that has been merged a while
back in its history ( svn://bcx-svn/
vodacom.za/pams/server/branches/V1-1-1-preprod/business_services/main_servl
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Marriott, Arthur
wrote:
> Actually, since the incumbent platform was already doing nightly backups
> using "svnadmin dump", we created fresh repositories on the new machine and
> incorporated the data using "svnadmin load". Admittedly there may have been
> a p
Hi
I'm trying to merge my trunk into my feature branch. I'm coming up with a
lot of expected tree conflicts (shown below).
Is there an quick/shorthand way to diff this to see the differences between
the copies?
C
business_services/main_servlet/src/main/resources/testconfigs/pams.properties
> -Original Message-
> From: xumuku [mailto:xum...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 25 July 2012 16:49
> To: subversion_us...@googlegroups.com
> Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; xum...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: Subversion authentication via SASL GSSAPI and
> likewise open
>
> My current /usr/lib/sasl2
Hi Vishwa, Thanks for sharing the correct url. I need one more help from you. I can see there are three different binaries for Windows in the below link but not sure which one to download. Below is my server details -- i) OS -> Windows 2008 Service Pack 2ii) Apache is not installed, (we need to ins
Note: please reply in-line and, if at all possible, in _plain_ text, not
html...
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Cooke, Mark
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Cooke, Mark
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> >
>Note: please reply in-line and, if at all possible, in _plain_ text, not
>html...
Sorry for this.
>As mentioned in one of the answers to your stackoverflow question (seeing
>as you insist on referencing it), svn 1.7 uses a new, faster protocol for
>mod_dav which you will be using by default if s
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Rupam Chowdhury wrote:
>
> Hi Vishwa,
>
> Thanks for sharing the correct url. I need one more help from you. I can
> see there are three different binaries for Windows in the below link but
> not sure which one to download. Below is my server details --
>
> i) OS -
30 matches
Mail list logo
