svnsync does not pass username

2012-07-02 Thread Warden, Neil
Hi all, I set up a slave repository. While running the svnsync command on the master using the --username and --password options those values are not passed to the slave machine. My pre-revprop-change hook get values for %1 (repository) and %2 (revision), but only empty string in %3 (should be

Garbage path in error message

2012-07-02 Thread Thuan Seah Tan
Hi guys, I am trying to debug this weird error that is coming from calling svn_client_status5. I am using Qt and I am converting my file path to ascii and passing the const char* to svn_client_status5 function. For those who know Qt, QByteArray dummyByteArray; foreach( const QString& file

Re: Importing multiple dumps into a single repository

2012-07-02 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jul 2, 2012, at 16:49, David Newman wrote: > Consider a repository with multiple projects. Each project is separately > dumped and imported into another repository. Where before the revisions were > sequential by time, now they are sequential by project. > > So far the only problem I ha

Re: bug in "Undoing Changes" functionality of merge -c -N?

2012-07-02 Thread Nairn Baliber
Hi Phillip. Thanks for the response. I am unclear about the intended functionality of SVN when using merge -c -M (or -r M:), given your response and the instructions in the svn book. If I display the conflict brought up by the aforementioned merge command, svn merge -c -4 file:///path_to_repos/t

Importing multiple dumps into a single repository

2012-07-02 Thread David Newman
Hi there, Consider a repository with multiple projects. Each project is separately dumped and imported into another repository. Where before the revisions were sequential by time, now they are sequential by project. So far the only problem I have come across is that checkout by date isn't comple

Re: bug in "Undoing Changes" functionality of merge -c -N?

2012-07-02 Thread Philip Martin
Nairn Baliber writes: > This creates a conflict (upon running that command, not on commit), whereby > the merge-left file contains everything up until line r4, and the > merge-right file contains everything up until line r3. In other words, > instead of removing a past change, the command seems t