Re: SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Mario Peshev wrote:pack > Hello everyone, > > I've installed a new FC 17 on my new notebook, added some software via the > yum package manager and today I've tried to checkout a project via SVN and > I got the following surprise: > > [nofearinc@nofearinc ~]$ svn

Re: SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Mario Peshev
Awesome, 1.7.4 works like a charm. Ping me if you have a 'buy me a beer' button or something, it's really helpful. Thanks a lot Mario Peshev Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev http://devrix.com http://peshev.net/blog On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:52 PM, M

Re: SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Mat Booth
On 14 June 2012 18:09, Mario Peshev wrote: > Thanks Mat, sorry for interrupting here. Submitted with ID 832154 in their > bugzilla if anyone is interested. > > If you wish to downgrade, the previous version that was delivered to the stable updates repo was this build: http://koji.fedoraproject.o

RE: Newer SSL libraries and TLSv1.2 incompatibilities

2012-06-14 Thread Garrison, Jim (ETW)
> -Original Message- > From: Garrison, Jim (ETW) [mailto:jim.garri...@nike.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:56 PM > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Newer SSL libraries and TLSv1.2 incompatibilities > > Regarding my question in the thread titled "When connecting to an http

Re: SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Mario Peshev
Thanks Mat, sorry for interrupting here. Submitted with ID 832154 in their bugzilla if anyone is interested. Mario Peshev Training and Consulting Services @ DevriX http://www.linkedin.com/in/mpeshev http://devrix.com http://peshev.net/blog On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Mat Booth wrote: > O

Re: SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Mat Booth
On 14 June 2012 16:52, Mario Peshev wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've installed a new FC 17 on my new notebook, added some software via the > yum package manager and today I've tried to checkout a project via SVN and I > got the following surprise: > > [nofearinc@nofearinc ~]$ svn > Segmentation f

SVN 1.7.5-1 FC17 segmentation fault every single call

2012-06-14 Thread Mario Peshev
Hello everyone, I've installed a new FC 17 on my new notebook, added some software via the yum package manager and today I've tried to checkout a project via SVN and I got the following surprise: [nofearinc@nofearinc ~]$ svn Segmentation fault (core dumped) I can't do anything, even checking ver

Re: How to create a tag from multiple revisions?

2012-06-14 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 2:19 AM, Lorenz wrote: > > you might want to read > http://svnbook.red-bean.com/nightly/en/svn.branchmerge.html > > > I would create a release branch from the last stable trunk version > (330) and merge in the trunk revisions that I want to go in the > release. Then create

Re: Nagios SVN Alerts

2012-06-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
ASF Infra has a nagios plugin that alerts us when the mirror server falls behind the master. Basically if $(svn info $master | sed -ne s/^Revision:.//p) > $slack + $(svn info $slave | sed -ne s/^Revision:.//p) echo "2 CRITICAL" fi Kaushal Shriyan wrote on Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:48:19 +0530:

Re: How to create a tag from multiple revisions?

2012-06-14 Thread Lorenz
marc wrote: >As the subject says, I want to create a tag consisting of at least 2 >different revisions in the trunk. >All revisions concern the same project. Reason is, I have several revisions >in the trunk and I want to exclude some revisions from the tag because the >code in those is not yet

Re: Nagios SVN Alerts

2012-06-14 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Kaushal Shriyan, am Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2012 um 06:18 schrieben Sie: > Is there a nagios plugin which will trigger alert if the svn codebase is > inconsistent in bunch of servers? What is an inconsistent svn codebase for you? Do you mean not running servers, which is what I would aspec