RE: Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread
From: Asher Stern [mailto:aste...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:07 PM To: Varnau, Steve (Seaquest R&D) Cc: Stefan Sperling; Stephen Butler; users@subversion.apache.org Subject: Re: Merge and record-only question Hi. Thank you all for your answers. Yet, I am not sure about m

Re: Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread Asher Stern
Hi. Thank you all for your answers. Yet, I am not sure about my question: If after all of this {merge --reintegrate, local changes in T, and merge --recode-only in B} - If later, there will be more changes / additions in B, and we will want to merge them to T, are we going to face any problems? Pr

RE: Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread
> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 5:13 AM > To: Stephen Butler > Cc: Asher Stern; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: Merge and record-only question > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:57:45PM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:

Re: Getting SVN E155035 after multiple updates of repository

2012-05-16 Thread Adam Mercer
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > Are you sure there are/were no authorizations applied on your server for > these files? Sorry, I'm not that familier with SVN (the admin who setup these repositories has since left). Where would these be set? > If you just did a checkout an

Re: Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 01:57:45PM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote: > I'd recommend doing cherrypicking merges from B to T. I believe either of Asher's or Steven's suggestion would work fine. If you go for the cherry-pick from B to T option, you might want to block the resulting commits to T from bei

Re: Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread Stephen Butler
On May 16, 2012, at 12:42 , Asher Stern wrote: > > Hi. > > I have a question about merge, reintegrate and record-only. > > We use SVN version 1.6 > > I am working on trunk, let's call it T. > My colleague works on a branch (branched from trunk), let's call it B. > > We want to merge back, i.

RE: Sparse directory: how to display the global state of the working copy

2012-05-16 Thread FOUCHE Emmanuel (EXT Atos Origin)
As I am on Windows XP, I had to install gnuwin32's gawk before testing. Minor changes to the command line are required: svn info -R | awk "/^Path/{p=$2} /^Depth: exclude/{print p}" Thanks -Message d'origine- De : MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] De la part de Philip Mart

Merge and record-only question

2012-05-16 Thread Asher Stern
Hi. I have a question about merge, reintegrate and record-only. We use SVN version 1.6 I am working on trunk, let's call it T. My colleague works on a branch (branched from trunk), let's call it B. We want to merge back, i.e., merge --reintegrate from B to T. However, there are some changes in

Re: Sparse directory: how to display the global state of the working copy

2012-05-16 Thread Philip Martin
"FOUCHE Emmanuel (EXT Atos Origin)" writes: > Is there a way to recursively display all excluded directories of a > given working copy. svn info -R | awk '/^Path/{p=$2} /^Depth: exclude/{print p}' -- Philip