Re: Vendor branch with customization, to be used in multiple projects

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:25:22PM -0400, Ryan Lange wrote: > Hello, > > I hope this is appropriate for the mailing list—and I apologize if it > isn't—but I have a repository design issue that I haven't been able to > find discussed elsewhere and was wondering if anyone would be willing > to offer

Re: Vendor branch with customization, to be used in multiple projects

2012-04-24 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 24, 2012, at 11:25, Ryan Lange wrote: > Hello, > > I hope this is appropriate for the mailing list—and I apologize if it > isn't—but I have a repository design issue that I haven't been able to > find discussed elsewhere and was wondering if anyone would be willing > to offer their though

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Stefan Sperling, am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 um 18:24 schrieben Sie: > is there ever more than one customer > branch involved in your case? No, as we only update other customers if necessary, then the get merged and on special bugs we would behave like described before. > It seems bett

Vendor branch with customization, to be used in multiple projects

2012-04-24 Thread Ryan Lange
Hello, I hope this is appropriate for the mailing list—and I apologize if it isn't—but I have a repository design issue that I haven't been able to find discussed elsewhere and was wondering if anyone would be willing to offer their thoughts. I'm using a single repository to hold multiple project

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 06:06:52PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > I don't think so, I need the tag to be as it is now, because that's > what get's deployed to the production servers and it really consists > all a web application for a customer needs and I want it versioned in > one combined fold

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Stefan Sperling, am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 um 17:48 schrieben Sie: > Ah, so you are obstructing a versioned file with a symlink? Yes. > That's why 'svn status' shows the '~' symbol which means "obstructed". Thanks. > I think you should somehow rearrange > your project so you don't

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 05:38:20PM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > No, each customer folder was a somewhen branched copy of the reference > folder and does have all of it's own versioned files and folders. The > links were just created on the filesystem level by deleting the > versioned file and

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning, am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 um 17:38 schrieben Sie: > No, each customer folder was a somewhen branched copy of the reference > folder and does have all of it's own versioned files and folders. The > links were just created on the filesystem level by deleting the > vers

Re: Trouble with shared object so file with svn_load_dirs.pl

2012-04-24 Thread Yves Martin
Le 23 avril 2012 17:46, Yves Martin a écrit : > Everything seems to be OK, except for one file - a Unix binary .so > executable file - the script detects it as added whereas it is already > present in the branch working copy and it has not changed at all. > > As a result, the "svn add" operation

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Stefan Sperling, am Dienstag, 24. April 2012 um 12:19 schrieben Sie: > you mention that you're using 1.7.2. > Have you tried 1.7.4? I upgraded and there were no changes in my described behaviour. Subversion seems to recognized the change of the file to a symbolic link itself, which seem

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 01:30:56PM +0300, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Can someone apply this to tigris please? Thanks, done. > > [[[ > * www/license-1.html: Link to the historic v1 license. > > Found by: Nico Kadel-Garcia > ]]] > > [[[ > Index: license-1.html > =

Re: Subversion 1.6.18 released

2012-04-24 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 18:28:05 +0300: > Stefan Sperling wrote on Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 17:00:19 +0200: > > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:05:36AM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > It's cool. I've seen projects fork and keep the same name before, and it > > > wasn't pretty. > >

Re: Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:55:47AM +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Hello, > > on one of our development servers we have a special setup with folders > for different customers, one reference folder with codebase of a web > application and the contents of the customer folders are linked > symbolic

Can't commit contents of symbolically linked files with Subversion 1.7.2...

2012-04-24 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Hello, on one of our development servers we have a special setup with folders for different customers, one reference folder with codebase of a web application and the contents of the customer folders are linked symbolically to the reference folder. The reason was to be able to test customers theme